Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 6;20:121. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01379-3

Table 2.

Mortality by reperfusion status and reperfusion-mortality association

Mortality
30-day 180-day
1. Mortality, n (%)
 No reperfusion (n = 20,159) 7959 (39.5) 9105 (45.2)
 PCI (n = 27,983) 3600 (12.9) 4649 (16.6)
 TBL only (n = 16,405) 3071 (18.7) 3708 (22.6)
2. Difference in mortalitya, % points (95% CI)
 PCI vs. no reperfusion −26.6* (−25.8, −27.4) −28.6* (−27.7, −29.4)
 TBL only vs. no reperfusion −20.8* (−19.9, − 21.7) −22.6* (− 21.6, − 23.5)
 PCI vs. TBL only −5.9* (−5.1, −6.6) −6.0* (−5.2, −6.8)
3. Difference in probability of dyingb, % points (95% CI)
 PCI vs. no reperfusion −19.6* (− 18.2, − 21.0) −21.1* (− 19.6, − 22.5)
 TBL only vs. no reperfusion −14.1* (− 13.3, − 14.9) −15.1* (−14.3, −16.0)
 PCI vs. TBL only −5.5* (− 2.7, −8.2) −5.4** (− 2.4, −8.5)

* P < 0.001; ** P < 0.01

a Crude analysis without any adjustment for baseline differences between treatment and control groups

b Average treatment effect on the treated (ATET), using PSM between treatment and control groups (See Additional file 1: Figures S4A, B, and C and Table S2 for the covariates predicting treatment probabilities); 95% CI based on robust standard error

CI confidence interval; n number of patients; PCI percutaneous coronary intervention; PSM propensity-score matching; TBL thrombolysis