Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 6;18:118. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02286-z

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses of the immune-related gene signature in one training set and two validation sets

Variables Univariate Cox analysis Multivariate Cox analysis
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P Hazard ratio (95% CI) P
Training set
 Immune-related gene signature (high- vs. low-risk) 2.57 (1.85–3.56) < 0.001 1.68 (1.11–2.54) 0.013
 Age (≥ 65 vs. <65 years) 1.21 (0.88–1.66) 0.235
 Gender (male vs. female) 1.05 (0.77–1.43) 0.773
 Tumor stage (stage 3–4 vs. 1–2) 2.81 (2.03–3.88) < 0.001 1.69 (1–2.86) 0.051
 T (T 3–4 vs. 1–2) 2.41 (1.61–3.60) < 0.001 1.48 (0.9–2.44) 0.123
 M (positive vs. negative) 1.86 (1.06–3.25) 0.03 1.05 (0.53–2.06) 0.896
 N (positive vs. negative) 2.64 (1.93–3.62) < 0.001 1.71 (1.09–2.66) 0.019
 Smoking (yes vs. no) 0.89 (0.57–1.41) 0.627
Validation set 1
 Immune-related gene signature (high- vs. low-risk) 9.11 (3.21–25.82) < 0.001 8.63 (2.95–25.21) < 0.001
 Age (≥ 65 vs. <65 years) 1.89 (0.96–3.71) 0.066
 Gender (male vs. female) 1.52 (0.78–2.96) 0.219
 Smoking (yes vs. no) 1.64 (0.84–3.20) 0.15
 KRAS mutation (yes vs. no) 0.87 (0.27–2.85) 0.817
 EGFR mutation (yes vs. no) 0.47 (0.24–0.93) 0.03 0.86 (0.43–1.73) 0.673
Validation set 2
 Immune-related gene signature (high- vs. low-risk) 2.80 (1.87–4.17) < 0.001 2.38 (1.57–3.62) < 0.001
 Age (≥ 65 vs. <65 years) 1.38 (0.89–2.14) 0.151
 Gender (male vs. female) 1.55 (1.07–2.25) 0.02 1.42 (0.97–2.09) 0.075
 Smoking (yes vs. no) 1.37 (0.60–3.14) 0.459
 Tumor stage (stage 3–4 vs. 1–2) 2.61 (1.74–3.91) < 0.001 2.63 (1.74–3.97) < 0.001
 KRAS mutation (yes vs. no) 1.46 (1.00–2.12) 0.049 1.1 (0.74–1.62) 0.643
 EGFR mutation (yes vs. no) 0.26 (0.10–0.71) 0.008 0.4 (0.14–1.10) 0.077
 TP53 mutation (yes vs. no) 1.24 (0.82–1.86) 0.313

CI confidence interval