Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 4;8:e8679. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8679

Table 2. Dissection of two QTLs using three NIL-F2 populations.

Population Segregating region Trait LOD A D R2 (%)
ZH1 Tw31911–Tw32437 TGW 2.83 −0.20 −0.15 6.05
GL 12.06 −0.069 −0.049 29.51
GW 5.77 0.004 −0.024 13.61
LWR 5.30 0.004 0.050 28.52
Tw35293–RM266 TGW 14.79 0.46 −0.19 31.76
GL 15.54 0.056 −0.008 17.95
GW 1.87 0.006 −0.003 3.73
LWR 0.17
ZH2 Tw35293–RM266 TGW 17.60 0.55 −0.02 28.63
GL 13.15 0.065 −0.022 22.34
GW 13.54 0.021 −0.001 22.91
LWR 0.39
ZH3 Tw35293–RM266 TGW 12.52 0.46 0.03 21.83
GL 17.42 0.061 −0.006 28.86
GW 12.81 0.020 0.001 22.37
LWR 0.38

Notes.

TGW
1,000-grain weight (g)
GL
Grain length (mm)
GW
Grain width (mm)
LWR
Length/width ratio
A
additive effect of replacing a Teqing allele with a IRBB52 allele
D
dominance effect
R2
proportion of the phenotypic variance explained by the QTL