Table 3. Validation of qTGW2 using two NIL populations.
| Population | Trait | Phenotype (Mean ± SD) | P | A | R2(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NILTQ | NILIRBB52 | |||||
| HY2 | TGW | 25.23 ± 0.29 | 26.17 ± 0.34 | <0.0001 | 0.47 | 60.94 |
| GL | 8.081 ± 0.045 | 8.189 ± 0.049 | <0.0001 | 0.054 | 48.26 | |
| GW | 2.784 ± 0.021 | 2.826 ± 0.025 | <0.0001 | 0.021 | 36.67 | |
| LWR | 2.915 ± 0.024 | 2.911 ± 0.031 | 0.5690 | |||
| HY3 | TGW | 22.65 ± 0.24 | 23.56 ± 0.26 | <0.0001 | 0.45 | 66.02 |
| GL | 7.919 ± 0.041 | 8.040 ± 0.036 | <0.0001 | 0.061 | 62.12 | |
| GW | 2.652 ± 0.017 | 2.678 ± 0.018 | <0.0001 | 0.013 | 22.74 | |
| LWR | 3.000 ± 0.022 | 3.017 ± 0.015 | 0.0003 | 0.009 | 12.94 | |
Notes.
- TGW
- 1,000-grain weight (g)
- GL
- Grain length (mm)
- GW
- Grain width (mm)
- LWR
- Length/width ratio
- A
- additive effect of replacing a Teqing allele with a IRBB52 allele
- D
- dominance effect
- R2
- proportion of the phenotypic variance explained by the QTL.
- NILTQ
- and NILIRBB52 Near-isogenic lines with Teqing and IRBB52 homozygous genotypes in the segregating region, respectively