Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 4;8:e8679. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8679

Table 3. Validation of qTGW2 using two NIL populations.

Population Trait Phenotype (Mean ± SD) P A R2(%)
NILTQ NILIRBB52
HY2 TGW 25.23 ± 0.29 26.17 ± 0.34 <0.0001 0.47 60.94
GL 8.081 ± 0.045 8.189 ± 0.049 <0.0001 0.054 48.26
GW 2.784 ± 0.021 2.826 ± 0.025 <0.0001 0.021 36.67
LWR 2.915 ± 0.024 2.911 ± 0.031 0.5690
HY3 TGW 22.65 ± 0.24 23.56 ± 0.26 <0.0001 0.45 66.02
GL 7.919 ± 0.041 8.040 ± 0.036 <0.0001 0.061 62.12
GW 2.652 ± 0.017 2.678 ± 0.018 <0.0001 0.013 22.74
LWR 3.000 ± 0.022 3.017 ± 0.015 0.0003 0.009 12.94

Notes.

TGW
1,000-grain weight (g)
GL
Grain length (mm)
GW
Grain width (mm)
LWR
Length/width ratio
A
additive effect of replacing a Teqing allele with a IRBB52 allele
D
dominance effect
R2
proportion of the phenotypic variance explained by the QTL.
NILTQ
and NILIRBB52 Near-isogenic lines with Teqing and IRBB52 homozygous genotypes in the segregating region, respectively