Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 4;8:e8679. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8679

Table 4. Fine mapping of qTGW2 using three NIL-F2 populations.

Population Trait Phenotype (Mean ± SD) LOD A D R2 (%)
Teqing IRBB52 Heterozygote
Z1 TGW 24.03 ± 0.53 23.99 ± 0.51 23.94 ± 0.66 0.20
GL 8.017 ± 0.073 8.004 ± 0.072 8.004 ± 0.065 0.26
GW 2.805 ± 0.032 2.809 ± 0.036 2.808 ± 0.034 0.06
LWR 2.858 ± 0.026 2.850 ± 0.026 2.851 ± 0.025 0.65
Z2 TGW 24.96 ± 0.54 25.90 ± 0.51 25.33 ± 0.49 18.38 0.46 −0.10 29.93
GL 8.156 ± 0.094 8.266 ± 0.091 8.205 ± 0.087 9.30 0.053 −0.008 16.26
GW 2.976 ± 0.026 3.004 ± 0.029 2.986 ± 0.022 7.76 0.014 −0.004 13.70
LWR 2.750 ± 0.041 2.762 ± 0.037 2.757 ± 0.031 0.68
Z3 TGW 26.26 ± 0.88 26.34 ± 0.73 26.20 ± 0.84 0.22
GL 8.272 ± 0.111 8.262 ± 0.078 8.271 ± 0.113 0.07
GW 3.046 ± 0.046 3.054 ± 0.027 3.043 ± 0.046 0.51
LWR 2.726 ± 0.070 2.714 ± 0.029 2.727 ± 0.067 0.39

Notes.

TGW
1,000-grain weight (g)
GL
Grain length (mm)
GW
Grain width (mm)
LWR
Length/width ratio
A
additive effect of replacing a Teqing allele with a IRBB52 allele
D
dominance effect
R2
proportion of the phenotypic variance explained by the QTL