Table 1.
Country (city or region) | Study period | Women (n) | Age (years) mean ± SD and/or range | Trimester | Dietary method | Dietary iron mg/day | Recommended iron intake at time of study mg/day | Iron intake below recommended % of women | Reference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD2 | Median | IQ3 range, CI4, percentiles5 | |||||||||
Bosnia (Canton Una Sana) | ∼2014 | ∼40 | 25.6 ± 1.7 | Not stated | 24-hour recall | 8.6 | RDA 27 | 100% had intake <RDA | [16] | ||
Croatia (Osijek) | 2010–2011 | 222 | Not stated | 1st | 24-hour recall | 9.5 | 7.5–12.43 | DRI 27 | 100% had intake <DRI | [17] | |
Croatia (Osijek) | 2010–2011 | 222 | Not stated | 2nd | 24-hour recall | 10.1 | 7.8–13.33 | DRI 27 | 100% had intake <DRI | [17] | |
Croatia (Osijek) | 2010–2011 | 222 | Not stated | 3rd | 24-hour recall | 11.2 | 8.7–14.6 | DRI 27 | 100% had intake <DRI | [17] | |
Czech Republic (Hradec Kralove Region) | 2009–2010 | 152 | 28.9 ± 3.6 | 1st | 7-day food diary | 14.0 ± 3.5 | RDA 27 | 52% had intake <RDA | [18] | ||
Czech Republic (Hradec Kralove Region) | 2009–2010 | 152 | ∼28.9 ± 3.6 | 2nd | 7-day food diary | 15.3 ± 3.5 | RDA 27 | 57% had intake <RDA | [18] | ||
Czech Republic (Hradec Kralove Region) | 2009–2010 | 152 | ∼28.9 ± 3.6 | 3rd | 7-day food diary | 16.3 ± 3.5 | RDA 27 | 60% had intake <RDA | [18] | ||
Finland (Oulu) | 1995–1996 | 113 | 29.6 ± 5.1 | 3rd | FFQ1 | 16.5 ± 4.5 | RDA 157 | [19] | |||
Finland (Oulu) | 1995–1996 | 113 | 29.6 ± 5.1 | 3rd | 5-day food diary × 2 | 12 ± 4 | RDA 157 | [19] | |||
Finland (Oulu) | 1995–1996 | 118 | 29.6 ± 5.1 | 3rd | 5-day food diary × 2 | 11.4 | 9.6–12.93 | RDA 157 | [20] | ||
Finland (Oulu & Tampere) | 1998–1999 | 797 | 29.6 ± 5.1 | 1st & 2nd & 3rd | FFQ1 | 18 ± 6 | RDA 157 | [21] | |||
Germany (Hamburg) | 2011–2013 | 200 (95% caucasian) | 31 ± 3.5 | 1st | 24-hour recall | 12 ± 4 | RDA 30 | 100% had intake <RDA | [22] | ||
Germany (Hamburg) | 2011–2013 | 200 (95% caucasian) | ∼31 ± 3.5 | 2nd | 24-hour recall | 13 ± 3 | RDA 30 | 100% had intake <RDA | [22] | ||
Germany (Hamburg) | 2011–2013 | 200 (95% caucasian) | ∼31 ± 3.5 | 3rd | 24-hour recall | 12 ± 3 | RDA 30 | 100% had intake <RDA | [22] | ||
Germany (Hamburg) | 2011–2013 | 200 (95% caucasian) | ∼31 ± 3.5 | 1st & 2nd & 3rd | 24-hour recall | 12 ± 2 | RDA 30 | 100% had intake <RDA | [22] | ||
Greece (Pireus) | 2003 | 98 | 18–40 | 2nd | FFQ | 11.6 ± 5.0 | 10.6–12.64 | DRI 30 (27)see text | 100% had intake <DRI | [23] | |
Greece (Pireus) | 2003 | 102 | 18–40 | 3rd | FFQ | 11.9 ± 4.9 | 11.0–12.94 | DRI 30 (27)see text | 100% had intake <DRI | [23] | |
Greece (Athens) | 2012 | 56 | 18–42 | 1st & 2nd | 24-hour recall × 3 | ∼15.4 ± 6.4 | DRI 27 | 98% had intake <DRI | [24] | ||
Hungary (Budapest) | 1990–1994 | 70 | 22.9 ± 4.4 (19–38) | 1st, 2nd & 3rd | FFQ | 11.3 ± 4.1 | RDA 20 | 81% had intake <70% of RDA | [25] | ||
Ireland (Dublin) | 2013 | 402 | 30.8 ± 5.2 | 1st | FFQ | 19.3 ± 10.3 | 17.0 | RDA 14 | 37% had intake <RDA | [26] | |
Norway (Nationwide MoBa study) | 2002–2005 | 7,455 nonsupplement users | 29.2 ± 4.8 | 2nd | FFQ | 10.8 ± 3.4 | 10.3 | 6.1–17.15 | RDA 157 | [27] | |
Norway (Nationwide MoBa Study) | 2002–2005 | 32,653 supplement users | 29.2 ± 4.8 | 2nd | FFQ | 11.3 ± 3.4 | 10.9 | 6.6–17.65 | RDA 157 | [27] | |
Norway (Oslo Region) | 2003–2004 | 119 | 31.2 ± 4.1 (23–44) | 2nd | FFQ | 11 | 7–195 | RDA 157 | [28] | ||
Norway (Oslo Region) | 2003–2004 | 119 | 31.2 ± 4.1 (23–44) | 2nd | 4-day weighed food diary | 10 | 7–155 | RDA 157 | [28] | ||
Poland (Nationwide) | 2009 | 512 | 20–35 | 3rd | 7-day food diary | 10.1 | RDA 24 | ∼100% had intake <RDA | [29] | ||
Portugal (Porto) | 2004–2005 | 249 | 29.2 ± 6.6 (18–40) | 3rd | FFQ | 16.0 | 12.5–19.23 | AR 22 | 88% had intake <AR | [30] | |
Portugal (Porto) | 2004–2005 | 70 | ∼29.8 ± 4.9 | 3rd | FFQ × 2 | 16.2 ± 5.5 | [31] | ||||
Portugal (Porto) | 2004–2005 | 101 | 29.8 ± 4.9 | 1st | 3-day food diary | 14.4 ± 4.8 | [31] | ||||
Portugal (Porto) | 2004–2005 | 101 | ∼29.8 ± 4.9 | 2nd | 3 days food diary | 14.3 ± 4.9 | [31] | ||||
Portugal (Porto) | 2004–2005 | 101 | ∼29.8 ± 4.9 | 3rd | 3-day food diary | 14.3 ± 5.0 | [31] | ||||
Portugal (Porto) | 2004–2005 | 101 | ∼29.8 ± 4.9 | 1st & 2nd & 3rd | 3-day food diary | 14.4 ± 3.7 | [31] | ||||
Spain (Reus) | 1991–1995 | 80 | 24–35 | Preconception ≤12 weeks | 7-day food diary | 8.3 ± 3.0 | RDA 18 | ∼98% had intake <RDA | [32] | ||
Spain (Reus) | 1991–1995 | 80 | 24–35 | 1st | 7-day food diary | ∼8.1 ± 2.1 | RDA 18 | ∼98% had intake <RDA | [32] | ||
Spain (Reus) | 1991–1995 | 80 | 24–35 | 3rd | 7-day food diary | ∼8.5 ± 2.8 | RDA 18 | ∼98% had intake <RDA | [32] | ||
Spain (Reus) | 1991–1995 | 80 | 24–35 | Postpartum 6 weeks | 7-day food diary | 8.2 ± 2.3 | RDA 18 | ∼98% had intake <RDA | [32] | ||
Spain (INMA-Valencia) | 2004–2005 | 822 | ∼17–40 | 1st | FFQ | 20.7 ± 3.4 | 20.4 | 15.6–27.05 | AR 22 DRI 27 | 68% had intake <DRI | [33] |
Sweden (Umeå)∗ | 2006–2009 | 209 | 23–40 | 1st | FFQ | ∼13.1 | ∼12.5–13.84 | RDA 157 | 98% had intake <RDA | [34] | |
UK (south West England) (ALSPAC) | 1991–1992 | 11,923 | 27.9 ± 5.0 (15–44) | 3rd | FFQ | 10.4 ± 3.3 | 10.2 | 5.4–16.25 | RNI 14.8 | ∼75% had intake <RNI | [35] |
UK (Southampton) | 1991–1992 | 569 caucasians | 26.4 ± 4.8 | 1st | FFQ | 15.0 | 12.2–18.63 | RNI 14.8 | [36] | ||
UK (Southampton) | 1991–1992 | 569 causasians | 26.4 ± 4.8 | 1st | 4-day food diary | 10.1 | 7.9–12.43 | RNI 14.8 | [36] | ||
UK (London) | 2002 | 42 caucasians | 33.2 ± 4.6 (19–40) | 1st | 4–7 day weighed food diary | 12.3 ± 4.6 | RNI 14.8 | 71% had intake <RNI | [37] | ||
UK (London) | 2002 | 42 caucasians | ∼33.2 ± 4.6 (19–40) | 2nd | 4–7 day weighed food diary | 12.1 ± 3.5 | RNI 14.8 | 79% had intake <RNI | [37] | ||
UK (London) | 2002 | 42 caucasians | ∼33.2 ± 4.6 (19–40) | 3rd | 4–7 day weighed food diary | 13.0 ± 5.3 | RNI 14.8 | 67% had intake <RNI | [37] | ||
UK (London) | 2002 | 42 caucasians | ∼33.2 ± 4.6 (19–40) | Postpartum | 4–7 day weighed food diary | 12.3 ± 4.5 | RNI 14.8 | 81% had intake <RNI | [37] | ||
UK (Sheffield) | 2003–2004 | 123 caucasians | 29 ± 6.4 (17–43) | 1st | FFQ | 11.2 ± 3.9 | 4.7–21.16 | RNI 14.8 | [38] | ||
UK (Sheffield) | 2003–2004 | 123 caucasians | 29 ± 6.4 (17–43) | 1st | 24-hour recall × 2 | 8.0 ± 2.8 | 2.6–17.86 | RNI 14.8 | [38] | ||
UK (Leeds) | 2003–2006 | 1,257 | 18–45 | 1st | 24-hour recall | 11.5 ± 5.3 | RNI 14.8 | 80% had intake <RNI | [39] |
1FFQ = Food Frequency Questionnaire; 2SD = standard deviation; 3IQ range = interquartile range, 25–75 percentiles; 4CI = 95% confidence interval; 55–95 percentile range; 6observed range; 7RDA for women of reproductive age. No specific recommendation for pregnant women; they are recommended oral iron supplements. AR = Estimated Average Requirement; daily intake levels estimated to meet the needs of half of the healthy pregnant women. DRI = Dietary Reference Intake; nutrition recommendations from the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (USA). RDA = Recommended Dietary Allowance; daily intake adequate to meet the nutrient requirements of nearly all (97%–98%) healthy pregnant women. RNI = Reference Nutrient Intake; daily intake adequate to meet the nutrient requirements of nearly all (97.5%) healthy pregnant women.