Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 25;2020:6849352. doi: 10.1155/2020/6849352

Table 2.

Differences in the evaluation of pain, circumference, and range of motion between the PEMF and control groups during the study.

PEMF group (n = 27) Control group (n = 25) p between groups
Pain VAS (mm) Before 6.2 ± 2.00 7.1 ± 1.88 0.0956
After 3 weeks 2.1 ± 1.41 3.5 ± 1.71 0.0052
p value I vs. II p < 0.01 p < 0.01
After 6 weeks 0.2 ± 0.42 2.7 ± 2.15 <0.0001
p value I vs. III p < 0.01 p < 0.01

Circumference of forearm (cm) Before 25.8 ± 2.46 25.9 ± 1.89 0.9198
After 3 weeks 24.7 ± 2.39 24.2 ± 1.94 0.5097
p value I vs. II p < 0.01 p < 0.01
After 6 weeks 23.9 ± 2.31 22.9 ± 1.95 0.1285
p value I vs. III p < 0.01 p < 0.01

Circumference of shoulder (cm) Before 28.1 ± 2.54 28.9 ± 3.51 0.4582
After 3 weeks 26.9 ± 2.52 27.6 ± 3.34 0.5097
p value I vs. II p < 0.01 p < 0.01
After 6 weeks 26.4 ± 2.36 26.8 ± 3.41 0.7486
p value I vs. III p < 0.01 p < 0.01

Range of motion (°) shoulder flexion Before 151.8 ± 18.96 146.4 ± 17.32 0.1331
After 3 weeks 162.1 ± 12.78 156.6 ± 13.87 0.0280
p value I vs. II p < 0.01 p < 0.01
After 6 weeks 167.5 ± 6.42 162.0 ± 9.43 0.0034
p value I vs. III

Shoulder extension Before 39.6 ± 5.23 37.8 ± 6.03 0.1935
After 3 weeks 47.7 ± 3.11 42.6 ± 5.19 0.0004
p value I vs. II p < 0.01 p < 0.01
After 6 weeks 49.7 ± 0.81 45.8 ± 4.29 0.0004
p value I vs. III p < 0.01 p < 0.01

Shoulder abduction Before 149.9 ± 18.21 142.3 ± 14.12 0.0727
After 3 weeks 164.5 ± 8.19 153.6 ± 12.7 0.0015
p value I vs. II p < 0.01 p < 0.01
After 6 weeks 168.4 ± 3.72 159.5 ± 10.01 0.0002
p value I vs. III p < 0.01 p < 0.01

Elbow flexion Before 116.1 ± 14.10 111.2 ± 8.55 0.2198
After 3 weeks 129.8 ± 14.10 122.8 ± 7.43 0.0115
p value I vs. II p < 0.01 p < 0.01
After 6 weeks 141.6 ± 7.19 132.1 ± 8.24 0.0001
p value I vs. III p < 0.01 p < 0.01

PEMF: pulsed electromagnetic fields; VAS : Visual Analogue Scale.