Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 13;7(1):53–62. doi: 10.1007/s40801-019-00176-5

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics for patients included in the study, in total and for patients with and without medication discrepancies (MD)

All patients (n = 933) Patients without MD (n = 580) Patients with MD (n = 353)
Age 83.1 (75–100) 82.7 (75–99) 83.7 (75–100)
Women 515 (55%) 313 (54%) 202 (57%)
Men 418 (45%) 267 (46%) 151 (43%)
Medication reconciliation 180 (19%) 111 (19%) 69 (20%)
Team-based medication review during hospitalisation 146 (16%) 89 (15%) 57 (16%)
Number of on-demand use drugsa 2.3 (2.2–2.5) 2.1 (2–2.3) 2.7 (2.5–2.9)
Number of continuous use drugs 9 (8.8–9.3) 8.5 (8.2–8.7) 9.9 (9.5–10.3)
Number of all drugsa 11.4 (11.1–11.7) 10.6 (10.3–11) 12.6 (12.1–13.1)
Number of drug changes 3.2 (3–3.4) 3.3 (3.1–3.5) 3 (2.8–3.3)
Multi-dose drug dispensinga 250 (27%) 95 (16%) 155 (44%)
Discharging doctor
 Junior 387 (42%) 250 (43%) 137 (39%)
 Resident 346 (37%) 210 (36%) 136 (39%)
 Specialist 200 (21%) 120 (21%) 80 (22%)
Discharge on weekday 859 (92%) 532 (92%) 327 (93%)
Discharge on weekend 74 (8%) 48 (8%) 26 (7%)
Discharge to home 728 (78%) 478 (82%) 250 (71%)
Discharge to nursing homea 203 (22%) 102 (18%) 101 (29%)

The numbers are presented as totals and (%) apart from age, presented as mean (range) and number of drugs and drug changes, presented as mean (95% confidence interval)

aStatistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between groups