Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 28;35(2):257–268. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.030

Table 2.

Advantages and disadvantages of commonly used biopsy procedures for lung cancer

Advantages Disadvantages
FBS High diagnostic yield for central and endobronchial lesion Low diagnostic yield for non-endobronchial lesion and peripheral lesion
EBUS-TBNA Acquisition of real-time ultrasound images Limitation in evaluationg peripheral lung lesion and other L/N
Accessibility to central lung lesion and some L/N (located in mediastinal, paratracheal, subcarinal, hilar, and interlobar area)
Collection of cell and some lung tissue
EBUS-GS Acquisition of real-time ultrasound images Requirement of professional training
Improved accessibility to more peripheral lesion Expensivenss
Collection of cell and some lung tissue
Navigation bronchoscopy Acquisition of reconstructed and a virtual road map to target Requirement of navigation program
Improved accessibility to more peripheral lesion Expensiveness
Collection of cell and some lung tissue
CT-NAB High diagnostic yield for peripheral lung lesion (diameter > 2 cm) Need of patient's cooperation (Keep posture and holding breath)
Collection of cell and some lung tissue
Gun biopsy High diagnostic yield using core-biopsy needles Collection of relatively sufficient lung tissue Need of patient's cooperation (Keep posture and holding breath)
Relatively prevalent complication: pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage

FBS, fiberoptic bronchoscopy; EBUS-TBNA, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration; L/N, lymph node; EBUS-GS, endobronchial ultrasound using a guide; CT-NAB, needle aspiration biopsy with CT guidance.