Table 2.
Advantages and disadvantages of commonly used biopsy procedures for lung cancer
Advantages | Disadvantages | |
---|---|---|
FBS | High diagnostic yield for central and endobronchial lesion | Low diagnostic yield for non-endobronchial lesion and peripheral lesion |
EBUS-TBNA | Acquisition of real-time ultrasound images | Limitation in evaluationg peripheral lung lesion and other L/N |
Accessibility to central lung lesion and some L/N (located in mediastinal, paratracheal, subcarinal, hilar, and interlobar area) | ||
Collection of cell and some lung tissue | ||
EBUS-GS | Acquisition of real-time ultrasound images | Requirement of professional training |
Improved accessibility to more peripheral lesion | Expensivenss | |
Collection of cell and some lung tissue | ||
Navigation bronchoscopy | Acquisition of reconstructed and a virtual road map to target | Requirement of navigation program |
Improved accessibility to more peripheral lesion | Expensiveness | |
Collection of cell and some lung tissue | ||
CT-NAB | High diagnostic yield for peripheral lung lesion (diameter > 2 cm) | Need of patient's cooperation (Keep posture and holding breath) |
Collection of cell and some lung tissue | ||
Gun biopsy | High diagnostic yield using core-biopsy needles Collection of relatively sufficient lung tissue | Need of patient's cooperation (Keep posture and holding breath) |
Relatively prevalent complication: pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage |
FBS, fiberoptic bronchoscopy; EBUS-TBNA, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration; L/N, lymph node; EBUS-GS, endobronchial ultrasound using a guide; CT-NAB, needle aspiration biopsy with CT guidance.