. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 9.

Published in final edited form as: Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Aug 15;31(1):91–99. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04071-z

Table 2.

Rabbit vs. nonhuman primate contractile force response to stimuli

Stimulant	Sham			Restorelle
	Rabbit (N = 10)	NHP (N = 8)	Rabbit vs. NHP	Rabbit (N = 9)	NHP (N = 8)	Rabbit vs. NHP
120 mM Potassium chloride (mN/mm³)	1.71 ± 0.52	0.26 ± 0.11	P value < 0.001^b	0.97 ± 0.41	0.14 ± 0.08	P value < 0.001^b
Electrical field stimulation (mN/mm³)	0.88 (1.10)	0.01 (0.02)	P value < 0.001^b	0.44 (0.43)	0.01 (0.02)	P value < 0.001^b
Electrical field stimulation (g/g)	0.46 (0.69)	0.46 (0.44)	P = 0.315^b	0.51 (0.36)	0.62 (0.49)	P = 0.610^a

NHP nonhuman primate

Data represented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range)

P value obtained using independent samples t-test

P value obtained using Mann-Whitney U test