Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 13;2013(8):CD001691. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001691.pub3

Donn 1981.

Methods Open randomised controlled trial. Randomisation was described as by lottery but there is no description of how allocation concealment was achieved
 Blinding of intervention: no
 Complete follow‐up: yes
 Blinding of main outcome measurement: yes
Participants Infants with birthweights < 1500 g, admitted to the NICU within 6 h, without congenital malformations and where the mother had not received barbiturates during pregnancy. n = 60. No information on infants excluded or lost after enrolment
Interventions 2 loading doses of 10 mg/kg phenobarbital each administered intravenously 12 h apart. Maintenance dose of 2.5 mg/h every 12 h was begun 12 h after. Doses were adjusted to maintain serum concentrations in the 20‐30 μg/mL range for 7 days
Outcomes Papile grade of IVH on ultrasound, ventriculomegaly, mechanical ventilation, pneumothorax requiring drainage, hypercapnia (pCO2 > 60 mm Hg), hypotension (systolic blood pressure 10 mm Hg below expected value or impaired perfusion), bicarbonate therapy, death
Notes Cerebral ultrasound was not carried out prior to trial entry so it was not possible to exclude babies who already had IVH before the first dose of phenobarbital
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation is described as by lottery
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk No information provided, but it is likely the next allocation was not known in advance as a lottery system was used
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Most likely there was no blinding of intervention
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcome assessment was done by ultrasonographers and neuroradiologists unaware of treatment allocation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All infants were followed‐up. The infants that died had a postmortem examination to ensure complete diagnosis of IVH
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to make a judgement as we have no access to a trial protocol