Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 7;2010(7):CD001563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001563.pub3

Kniest 1991.

Methods Double‐blind, matched pair controlled trial
Participants 20 subjects aged 12 to 36 with house dust mite rhinitis. Divided into matched pairs on clinical and environmental parameters and then arbitrarily allocated to one of the 2 interventions.
Interventions 12 months of intensive home cleaning either with or without the addition of acaricide (solidified benzyl benzoate)
Outcomes Daily symptoms and medication scores
Physician assessment
Total and mite‐specific IgE
Blood and nose eosinophils
Guanine exposure
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk "From each subject group, one member was arbitrarily allocated to acaricidal cleaning treatment and the other to control treatment". No further details of the randomisation technique were provided
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Insufficient information
Blinding? Low risk "The allocation was unknown to both experimenters and subjects until the end of the study"
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk All outcome data reported
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk Use of an unusual trial design in which matched pairs were identified and use of unusual statistical tests to modify data
Free of other bias? Unclear risk Patients were selected from outpatients file, so may not represent the standard population