Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 7;2010(7):CD001563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001563.pub3

Terreehorst 2003.

Methods Double‐blind randomised controlled trial
Participants 279 participants aged 8 to 50 years with history of allergic rhinitis and/or asthma
Interventions Using bed covers that were impermeable to mite allergens
Outcomes Score on the rhinitis‐specific VAS, daily symptom score, the score on nasal allergen‐provocation testing, and concentrations of Der p1 and Der f1
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk "Central randomisation was used"
Allocation concealment? Low risk Adequate
Blinding? Low risk "A randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial"
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk Loss to follow up is described fully in Figure 1. "Intention‐to‐treat analysis was performed with the use of data all 232 patients from whom valid scores on the visual‐analogue scale could be obtained after 12 months"
Free of selective reporting? Low risk No evidence of selective reporting of outcomes
Free of other bias? Low risk No evidence of other bias

HDM = house dust mite 
 PEF = peak expiratory flow 
 RQLQ = rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire 
 VAS = visual analogue scale