Table 3.
Study |
Risk of bias (domains) |
|||||
Inadequate selection of participants | Inadequate consideration of confounding variables | Inadequate measurement of exposure | Inadequate blinding of outcome assessments | Inadequate handling of incomplete outcome data | Selective reporting of outcomes | |
Podymova et al[34], 19981 | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Unclear | Low |
Fiorelli[32], 1999 | High | High | Low | Unclear | Low | Low |
Virukalpattigo-palratnam et al[36], 2013 | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | High | Low |
Perlamutrov et al[31], 2014 | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Low |
Larionova et al[30], 20151 | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | High | Low |
Ivashkin et al[35], 2018 | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Low |
Published studies translated to English from original language. Risk of bias within each domain was judged as low, unclear, or high, using the risk-of-bias assessment tool for non-randomized studies[29].