Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;12(2):46–63. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i2.46

Table 4.

Summary of outcome data relating to prespecified biochemical liver parameters (randomized studies)

Parameter Study Disease Intervention Baseline
After treatment
Statistical method P value
AdoMet Placebo / comparator AdoMet Placebo / comparator
ALT
ALT (μkat/L) Frezza et al[33], 1990 Chronic liver disease with IHC (N = 220) AdoMet (n = 110) vs placebo (n = 110) 3.3 ± 0.4 (mean ± SE) 2.8 ± 0.3 2.3 ± 0.2 (Week 1), 1.5 ± 0.1 (Week 2) 2.4 ± 0.2 (Week 1), 2.2 ± 0.2 (Week 2) Split-plot analysis Not reported at Week 1, P < 0.05 vs placebo at Week 2
ALT (μkat/L) Manzillo et al[38], 1992 IHC (N = 343) AdoMet (n = 180) vs placebo (n = 163) 1.2 (1.1, 1.4) (mean, 95% CI) 1.2 (1.1, 1.4) 0.8 (0.7, 0.9) 1.0 (0.9, 1.2) Split-plot analysis (MANOVA) P < 0.01 treatment-to-time interaction vs placebo at Week 2
ALT (U/L) Qin et al[37], 20001 Intrahepatic cholestatic viral hepatitis (N = 30) AdoMet (n = 15) vs potassium magnesium aspartate (n = 15) 198.5 ± 75.2 (mean ± SD) 190.6 ± 71.2 127.0 ± 47.5 (Week 2), 48.2 ± 43.5 (Week 4) 130.2 ± 47.2 (Week 2), 67.7 ± 27.2 (Week 4) x2 test for comparison of rates; t test for comparison of means NS at Week 2 P < 0.05 vs comparator at Week 4
AST
AST (μkat/L) Frezza et al[33], 1990 Chronic liver disease with IHC (N = 220) AdoMet (n = 110) vs placebo (n = 110) 2.4 ± 0.2 (mean ± SE) 2.1 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.1 (Week 1), 1.3 ± 0.1 (Week 2) 1.8 ± 0.2 (Week 1), 1.7 ± 0.2 (Week 2) Split-plot analysis NS vs placebo at Weeks 1 and 2
AST (μkat/L) Manzillo et al[38], 1992 IHC (N = 343) AdoMet (n = 180) vs placebo (n = 163) 1.4 (1.2, 1.6) (mean, 95% CI) 1.3 (1.2, 1.5) 0.9 (0.9, 1.1) 1.0 (0.9, 1.2) Split-plot analysis (MANOVA) P < 0.05 treatment-to-time interaction vs placebo at Week 2
AST (U/L) Qin et al[37], 20001 Intrahepatic cholestatic viral hepatitis (N = 30) AdoMet (n = 15) vs potassium magnesium aspartate (n = 15) 127.0 ± 60.7 (mean ± SD) 118.2 ± 58.7 84.6 ± 33.8 (Week 2), 45.6 ± 28.2 (Week 4) 78.3 ± 38.5 (Week 2), 52.7 ± 25.3 (Week 4) x2 test for comparison of rates; t test for comparison of means NS at Week 2 P < 0.05 vs comparator at Week 4
ALP
ALP (μkat/L) Frezza et al[33], 1990 Chronic liver disease with IHC (N = 220) AdoMet (n = 110) vs placebo (n = 110) 4.5 ± 0.3 (mean ± SE) 4.7 ± 0.3 3.7 ± 0.3 (Week 1), 3.2 ± 0.2 (Week 2) 4.6 ± 0.3 (Week 1), 4.4 ± 0.3 (Week 2) Split-plot analysis P < 0.05 vs placebo at Week 1, P < 0.01 vs placebo at Week 2
ALP (μkat/L) Manzillo et al[38], 1992 IHC (N = 343) AdoMet (n = 180) vs placebo (n = 163) 4.8 (4.2, 5.5) (mean, 95% CI) 4.9 (4.3, 5.7) 3.9 (3.4, 4.4) 4.0 (3.4, 4.7) Split-plot analysis (MANOVA) NS vs placebo at Week 2
ALP (U/L) Qin et al[37], 20001 Intrahepatic cholestatic viral hepatitis (N = 30) AdoMet (n = 15) vs potassium magnesium aspartate (n = 15) 203.2 ± 39.5 (mean ± SD) 202.8 ± 39.4 93.5 ± 33.7 (Week 2), 85.6 ± 20.6 (Week 4) 97.5 ± 33.0 (Week 2), 89.1 ± 27.8 (Week 4) x2 test for comparison of rates; t test for comparison of means NS vs comparator at Weeks 2 and 4
γGT
γGT (μkat/L) Frezza et al[33], 1990 Chronic liver disease with IHC (N = 220) AdoMet (n = 110) vs placebo (n = 110) 2.5 ± 0.3 (mean ± SE) 2.2 ± 0.2 1.9 ± 0.3 (Week 1), 1.5 ± 0.2 (Week 2) 1.9 ± 0.1 (Week 1), 1.7 ± 0.1 (Week 2) Split-plot analysis NS at Week 1 or Week 2
γGT (μkat/L) Manzillo et al[38], 1992 IHC (N = 343) AdoMet (n = 180) vs placebo (n = 163) 1.9 (1.6, 2.2) (mean, 95% CI) 1.8 (1.6, 2.2) 1.2 (1.0, 1.3) 1.3 (1.1, 1.6) Split-plot analysis (MANOVA) P < 0.05 treatment-to-time interaction vs placebo at Week 2
1

Published studies translated to English from original language. AdoMet: S-adenosylmethionine; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; CI: Confidence interval; γGT: Gamma-glutamyl transferase; IHC: Intrahepatic cholestasis; MANOVA: Multivariate analysis of variance; NS: Not significant; SD: Standard deviation; SE: Standard error.