Skip to main content
. 1999 Apr 26;1999(2):CD000948. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000948

Comparison 1. Nasal vs oral intubation (all infants).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Procedure failure 1 91 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 13.28 [0.77, 229.07]
2 Malposition on initial intubation 1 91 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.64, 1.57]
3 Accidental extubation 1 91 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.67 [0.27, 1.62]
4 Tube blockage 1 86 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.83 [0.75, 4.51]
5 Post extubation atelectasis in babies extubated 2 160 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.85 [1.08, 3.18]
6 Re‐intubation in babies extubated 2 160 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.64 [0.75, 3.59]
7 Septicemia 1 86 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.15, 6.78]
8 Clinical infection 1 91 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.10 [0.89, 4.91]
9 Nasal or palatal trauma 1 86 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.33 [0.32, 5.61]