Skip to main content
. 1999 Apr 26;1999(2):CD000948. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000948
Study Reason for exclusion
Dankle 1987 Retrospective analysis of infants intubated using predominantly orotracheal tubes. No comparison made between the two routes of intubation.
Erenberg 1984 Infants requiring orotracheal or orogastric tubes were studied for palatal grooves using maxillary casts. It was not stated how the infants were recruited into the study. No comparison between two routes of intubation.
Gowdar 1980 Cohort study of infants who required nasal CPAP and/or nasal intubation. No comparison with oral route of intubation.
Noblett 1995 The study evaluated the performance of respiratory care practitioners through self evaluation following each oral intubation. No comparison with nasal route of intubation.
Stewart 1980 Retrospective review of surviving infants who required nasotracheal intubation. No comparison with oral route of intubation.