Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 2;2013(7):CD001757. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001757.pub4

Comparison 4. Total pelvic floor repair versus anterior levatorplasty.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Number of patients with no change in incontinence 0   Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Number of patients failing to achieve full continence 1   Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Number of patients with no improvement in faecal urgency 0   Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Number of patients with dyspareunia 1   Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Maximum resting anal pressure (cm/water) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6 Maximum squeeze pressure (cm/water) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
7 Number of patients with no improvement in anal canal sensation (mA) 1   Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
8 Functional length of anal canal (cm) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected