Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 2;2013(7):CD001757. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001757.pub4

Tjandra 2003.

Methods Allocation: unclear
 Blinding: participants blinded to repair. No mention of blinding of surgeons or outcome assessors
 Withdrawals: none
 Intention‐to‐treat: yes
 Follow‐up period: median 18 months (range 10‐34 months)
 Setting: single centre, Australia
 Exclusion criteria: patients with prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency
Participants Sample size = 23
 Median age = 46 years (range 31‐71 years)
 Women with localised anterior defect of external sphincter after obstetric damage
Interventions Overlap sphincter repair versus direct end to end repair
Outcomes Primary outcomes:
 ‐ no change in incontinence
 Secondary outcomes:
 ‐ adverse function
 ‐ complications
 ‐ physiological outcomes
 ‐ incontinence score
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear