Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD001901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001901.pub2

Wu 2009.

Methods Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
2 treatment arms: 1 PCB and 1 LEV
Randomisation concealment: method not stated. Study medications were supplied and packaged by UCB S.A. Pharma. Method of sequence generation: not stated
Blinding: "matched placebo" was used. No further specification
Baseline: 8 weeks. Treatment period = 16 weeks (4 weeks' titration, 12 weeks' maintenance)
Participants All adults. Multicentre (6 centres in China) 
 Total randomised 206 adults 
 103 adults to PCB
103 adults to LEV 3000 mg 
 54% male in PCB and 50% male in LEV 
 Age range: 16 to 70 years 
 Other AEDs: 1 or 2 
 ≥ 8 focal seizures during 8‐week baseline
Diagnosis of focal epilepsy made ≥ 6 months before screening
Mean duration of epilepsy (± SD) (years): LEV = 16.5 ± 12.7, PCB = 17.3 ± 12.1
Median baseline seizure frequency per week: LEV 1.81 (IQR = 1.13 to 3.38), PCB 1.75 (IQR = 1.13 to 4.00)
Interventions LEV 3000 mg
PCB
Up‐titration dosages: started with 500 mg (1 tablet) twice daily and was up‐titrated in twice‐daily increments of 500 mg (1 tablet) at 2‐week intervals; the dose was increased to 2000 mg/day after 2 weeks and to 3000 mg/day after an additional 2 weeks
Outcomes ≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency
Treatment withdrawal
Adverse effects
Notes 4 participants excluded from 50% responder analysis: 1 in LEV 3000 mg and 3 in PCB
A few participants (1 in LEV, 2 in PCB) had primary generalised‐onset seizures in addition to partial‐onset seizures. 1 patient (1.0%) in the LEV group and 2 (1.9%) in the PCB group temporarily discontinued the study drug, while 8 (7.8%) and 2 (1.9%) patients in the LEV and PCB groups, respectively, reduced the dosage because of adverse events
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk A ‐ Adequate
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk A ‐ Adequate
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate