Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 13;18(4):944–954. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13258

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Late flowering and plant architecture phenotypes of amiRNA‐FTa1 transgenic lines are stable after subsequent cut and regrowth cycles. (a) Phenotype of WT plants compared to transgenic lines after cut and a second regrowth cycle. (b) Days to first flower, (c) nodes to first flower and (d) height / node ratio of transgenic lines after cut and a second regrowth cycle. All plants were grown at 23°C under a LD photoperiod. Bars represent the means ± SE of 8–10 individual grown clonal plants per line. Results were analysed by a one‐way ANOVA with posterior Dunnett test. Asterisks represent different levels of significance (P ≤ 0.05 = *, P ≤ 0.01 = **, P ≤ 0.001 = ***).