Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 8;8(1):e000148. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000148

Table 4.

Comparison of CAR-T and TIL infusion products

CAR-T
n=24
TIL (n=40–88) P value
T cell subpopulations
CD8+ 58±16 63±24 (n=88) 0.386
CD4+ 42±17 35±24 (n=88) 0.200
Differentiation status
TN 49±18 0.05±0.10 (n=88) 0.001
TCM 17±14 2.3±2.5 (n=88) 0.001
TEM 18±13 96.8±3.0 (n=88) 0.001
TEMRA 15±13 0.82±1.5 (n=88) 0.001
Co-stimulatory / co-inhibitory molecules
CD28 + CD3+ 47±26 52±20 (n=88) 0.396
PD1 + CD3+ 26±8 26±15 (n=40) 0.494
LAG3 + CD3+ 25±11 10±4 (n=40) 0.001
TIM3 + CD3+ 50±15 61±14 (n=40) 0.004
Chemokine receptors
CCR5 + CD3+ 12±13 80±24 (n=56) 0.001
CCR4 + CD3+ 33±14 27±12 (n=88) 0.032
CXCR3 + CD3+ 79±12 86±20 (n=88) 0.076

Phenotype analysis of 24 CAR-T cells and 40 to 88 TIL infusion products. Cells were gated on viable cells. TIL, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, TN (naïve T cells), CD3+CD45RA+CCR7+; TCM (central memory T cells), CD3+CD45RA−CCR7+; TEM (effector memory T cells), CD3+CD45RA−CCR7−; TEMRA (effector T cells), CD3+CD45RA+CCR7−.

CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T cells.