Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am Psychol. 2019 Jun 13;75(3):365–379. doi: 10.1037/amp0000477

Table 1.

Example Posts With Application of Scoring Rules From Methods

User Text Sad word Happy word Suicide-related word Sad post SRV post User sadness User SRV score
A “I’m so sad! Gonna kill myself sad, kill kill 1 1 3 2
A “I’m the worst lol:)” worst lol,:) worst 1 0
A “My final day on Earth …” final 0 1
A “Just got in a fight” fight 1 0
B “It’s a sad day” sad 1 0 1 0
B “I love my life” love, life 0 0

Note. “User” represents the ID of a hypothetical Twitter user, whose posts are given in the “Text” column. The “Sad word,” “Happy word,” and “Suicide-related word” columns identify which words (if any) from the user’s post fall into the sad, happy, or suicide-related word categories described in the Method section and depicted in Figure 3. “Sad post” and “SRV post” represent dummy-coded variables representing whether the post would be classified as sad (scored 1 if the post included any sad word; 0 otherwise) or SRV-positive (scored 1 if the post included a suicide-related word but no happy words; 0 otherwise). “User sadness” and “User SRV score” columns represent the total number of sad and SRV-positive posts by each hypothetical user; these are the scores being analyzed in this investigation (i.e., Are SRV scores more assortative than chance? Do they remain so after controlling for sadness scores?). SRV = suicide-related verbalization.