Table 1.
User | Text | Sad word | Happy word | Suicide-related word | Sad post | SRV post | User sadness | User SRV score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | “I’m so sad! Gonna kill myself | sad, kill | kill | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | |
A | “I’m the worst lol:)” | worst | lol,:) | worst | 1 | 0 | ||
A | “My final day on Earth …” | final | 0 | 1 | ||||
A | “Just got in a fight” | fight | 1 | 0 | ||||
B | “It’s a sad day” | sad | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
B | “I love my life” | love, life | 0 | 0 |
Note. “User” represents the ID of a hypothetical Twitter user, whose posts are given in the “Text” column. The “Sad word,” “Happy word,” and “Suicide-related word” columns identify which words (if any) from the user’s post fall into the sad, happy, or suicide-related word categories described in the Method section and depicted in Figure 3. “Sad post” and “SRV post” represent dummy-coded variables representing whether the post would be classified as sad (scored 1 if the post included any sad word; 0 otherwise) or SRV-positive (scored 1 if the post included a suicide-related word but no happy words; 0 otherwise). “User sadness” and “User SRV score” columns represent the total number of sad and SRV-positive posts by each hypothetical user; these are the scores being analyzed in this investigation (i.e., Are SRV scores more assortative than chance? Do they remain so after controlling for sadness scores?). SRV = suicide-related verbalization.