Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 9.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2019 Dec;31(5):1863–1872. doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000889

Table 1.

Comparisons of preintervention sample characteristics for the RCT population and selected and participating evaluation subsamples

Variable RCT population versus selected and interviewed evaluation subsamples
RCT population (n = 4,777) Selected evaluation subsample (n = 664) Participating evaluation subsample (n = 531)
% Participation of selected 80.0
Infant cumulative birth risk
 % Low birth weight 10.0 9.1 (p = .50) 8.9 (p = .45)
 % Gestation <37 weeks 8.2 6.7 (p = .17) 6.3 (p = .12)
 % Any birth complications 7.4 5.8 (p = .13) 6.1 (p = .26)
 % Cesarean section birth 30.6 31.6 (p = .59) 31.8 (p = .56)
 % Medicaid/no insurance 60.8 63.1 (p = .26) 65.5 (p = .04)
Mother age (mean, years) 28.5 28.5 (p = .84) 28.3 (p = .58)
Mother race/ethnicity
 %White, non-Hispanic 29.7 29.2 (p = .80) 26.6 (p = .13)
 % Black 36.7 38.0 (p = .54) 39.4 (p = .23)
 % Hispanic 22.6 23.2 (p = .71) 24.7 (p = .27)
 % Other 11.1 9.6 (p = .27) 9.4 (p = .25)
% Infant female 49.8 54.7 (p < .01) 53.5 (p = .11)

Note: Column 2 and Column 3 are contrasted with Column 1, with significance level in parentheses. A Holm–Bonferroni sequential correction was applied to account for multiple tests of between-group differences. No moderation terms remained statistically significant after applying a Holm-Bonferroni sequential correction.