Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 16;30(4):2082–2090. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06557-2

Table 3.

Number of PRECISE cases on a per-patient and on a per-scan basis, for each reader in the two different cohorts and in the overall population

Per-patient
UCL (n = 40) Sapienza (n = 40) Overall (n = 80)
Reader 1 Reader 2 Reader 1 Reader 2 Reader 1 Reader 2
PRECISE 1 3 (7) 3 (7) 3 (7) 2 (3) 6 (8) 5 (5)
PRECISE 2 1 (3) 1 (3) 5 (12) 1 (3) 6 (8) 2 (2)
PRECISE 3 21 (53) 20 (50) 23 (58) 27 (67) 44 (55) 47 (59)
PRECISE 4 10 (25) 11 (27) 8 (20) 10 (27) 18 (22) 21 (28)
PRECISE 5 5 (12) 5 (13) 1 (3) NA 6 (7) 5 (6)
Per-scan
UCL (n = 111) Sapienza (n = 68) Overall (n = 179)
Reader 1 Reader 2 Reader 1 Reader 2 Reader 1 Reader 2
PRECISE 1 4 (4) 6 (5) 4 (6) 3 (3) 8 (5) 9 (5)
PRECISE 2 1 (1) 1 (1) 6 (9) 1 (1) 7 (4) 2 (1)
PRECISE 3 83 (75) 85 (77) 46 (68) 52 (77) 129 (72) 137 (76)
PRECISE 4 19 (17) 14 (13) 11 (16) 12 (19) 30 (16) 26 (15)
PRECISE 5 4 (3) 5 (4) 1 (1) NA 5 (3) 5 (3)

Percentages in parentheses (%). At UCL, three different scanners were used: two 1.5-T (Symphony or Avanto, Siemens) and one 3-T system (Achieva, Philips), with a pelvic phased-array coil. At Sapienza, all exams were performed on a 3-T scanner (Discovery MR750, GE Healthcare) using a 32-multichannel surface phased-array body coil, but in some of the earlier scans, an endorectal coil was also used

UCL University College London, NA not available