Table 5.
Overall PRECISE scores (n = 80) as assessed by each reader
| Reader 1 | Total | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRECISE 1 | PRECISE 2 | PRECISE 3 | PRECISE 4 | PRECISE 5 | PRECISE 1,2 and 3 |
PRECISE 4 and 5 |
|||
| Reader 2 | PRECISE 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | – | – | 6 |
| PRECISE 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | – | – | 6 | |
| PRECISE 3 | 2 | 0 | 40 | 2 | 0 | – | – | 44 | |
| PRECISE 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 1 | – | – | 18 | |
| PRECISE 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | – | – | 6 | |
| PRECISE 1, 2 and 3 | – | – | – | – | – | (52) | (4) | (56) | |
| PRECISE 4 and 5 | – | – | – | – | – | (2) | (22) | (24) | |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 47 | 21 | 5 | (54) | (26) | 80 (80) | |
Data in parentheses show the results according to radiological regression or stability (PRECISE 1, 2 and 3) and radiological progression (PRECISE 4 and 5)