Table 4.

Performance comparison of different potentials.

		DFIRE2	DOPE	RW	RWplus	GOAP	NEPRE-R	NEPRE-F
I-TASSER(a)	Top1§	53	48	54	56*	3	50	48
(56)#	Top5	55	48	55	56	14	50	48
	Top10	55	49	55	56	17	53	50
I-TASSER(b)	Top1	0	11	0	0	3	20	22
(56)	Top5	2	25	1	2	3	27	28
	Top10	2	29	4	4	3	29	33
Rosetta	Top1	0	7	0	0	1	26	34
(58)	Top5	2	31	2	2	7	45	49
	Top10	5	43	8	8	7	51	53
Modeller	Top1	2	6	2	2	1	14	13
(20)	Top5	4	8	4	4	5	16	16
	Top10	6	10	6	7	6	17	18
3DRobot	Top1	38	63	0	0	4	129	149
(200)	Top5	49	141	5	8	13	160	173
	Top10	60	165	9	10	15	176	183

^#Number of proteins.

^§The number of cases whose native structures are in the n best models selected based on scoring functions.

^*Numbers in bold font indicate the best scoring function for that assessment.