Table 1.
Quantitative comparison of reconstructions by approximant, DNN-L and DNN-S based on a test set of 500 images. Each entry takes the form ’average ± standard deviation’.
Average PCC ± std.dev | Average PSNR ± std.dev (dB) | Average SSIM ± std.dev | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p = 1 | p = 10 | p = 1 | p = 10 | p = 1 | p = 10 | |
Approximant fˆ∗ | 0.148 ± 0.070 | 0.182 ± 0.086 | 8.448 ± 4.182 | 8.465 ± 4.190 | 0.231 ± 0.111 | 0.233 ± 0.112 |
DNN-L output fˆLF | 0.812 ± 0.126 | 0.878 ± 0.083 | 16.520 ± 2.693 | 18.439 ± 2.811 | 0.878 ± 0.088 | 0.923 ± 0.063 |
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.1) | 0.847 ± 0.111 | 0.891 ± 0.078 | 17.596 ± 2.612 | 18.653 ± 2.289 | 0.903 ± 0.078 | 0.928 ± 0.065 |
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.2) | 0.857 ± 0.088 | 0.895 ± 0.079 | 17.816 ± 2.821 | 18.716 ± 2.286 | 0.906 ± 0.063 | 0.928 ± 0.058 |
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.3) | 0.859 ± 0.105 | 0.896 ± 0.074 | 18.017 ± 2.583 | 18.749 ± 2.228 | 0.910 ± 0.075 | 0.932 ± 0.065 |
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.4) | 0.865 ± 0.104 | 0.895 ± 0.073 | 18.234 ± 2.484 | 19.040 ± 2.284 | 0.926 ± 0.069 | 0.934 ± 0.057 |
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.5) | 0.869 ± 0.112 | 0.897 ± 0.073 | 18.600 ± 2.297 | 19.072 ± 2.271 | 0.929 ± 0.081 | 0.935 ± 0.056 |
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.6) | 0.869 ± 0.108 | 0.898 ± 0.077 | 18.566 ± 2.540 | 19.041 ± 2.264 | 0.926 ± 0.080 | 0.935 ± 0.060 |
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.7) | 0.864 ± 0.125 | 0.895 ± 0.079 | 17.827 ± 2.377 | 19.032 ± 2.267 | 0.927 ± 0.086 | 0.932 ± 0.069 |
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.8) | 0.845 ± 0.115 | 0.893 ± 0.076 | 17.577 ± 2.546 | 19.031 ± 2.755 | 0.902 ± 0.081 | 0.931 ± 0.063 |
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 1) | 0.821 ± 0.147 | 0.890 ± 0.078 | 17.051 ± 2.306 | 18.841 ± 2.717 | 0.902 ± 0.092 | 0.931 ± 0.063 |
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 2) | 0.819 ± 0.113 | 0.882 ± 0.078 | 16.822 ± 2.586 | 18.645 ± 2.860 | 0.889 ± 0.081 | 0.928 ± 0.059 |