Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 9;9:36. doi: 10.1038/s41377-020-0267-2

Table 1.

Quantitative comparison of reconstructions by approximant, DNN-L and DNN-S based on a test set of 500 images. Each entry takes the form ’average ± standard deviation’.

Average PCC ± std.dev Average PSNR ± std.dev (dB) Average SSIM ± std.dev
p = 1 p = 10 p = 1 p = 10 p = 1 p = 10
Approximant fˆ∗ 0.148 ± 0.070 0.182 ± 0.086 8.448 ± 4.182 8.465 ± 4.190 0.231 ± 0.111 0.233 ± 0.112
DNN-L output fˆLF 0.812 ± 0.126 0.878 ± 0.083 16.520 ± 2.693 18.439 ± 2.811 0.878 ± 0.088 0.923 ± 0.063
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.1) 0.847 ± 0.111 0.891 ± 0.078 17.596 ± 2.612 18.653 ± 2.289 0.903 ± 0.078 0.928 ± 0.065
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.2) 0.857 ± 0.088 0.895 ± 0.079 17.816 ± 2.821 18.716 ± 2.286 0.906 ± 0.063 0.928 ± 0.058
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.3) 0.859 ± 0.105 0.896 ± 0.074 18.017 ± 2.583 18.749 ± 2.228 0.910 ± 0.075 0.932 ± 0.065
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.4) 0.865 ± 0.104 0.895 ± 0.073 18.234 ± 2.484 19.040 ± 2.284 0.926 ± 0.069 0.934 ± 0.057
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.5) 0.869 ± 0.112 0.897 ± 0.073 18.600 ± 2.297 19.072 ± 2.271 0.929 ± 0.081 0.935 ± 0.056
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.6) 0.869 ± 0.108 0.898 ± 0.077 18.566 ± 2.540 19.041 ± 2.264 0.926 ± 0.080 0.935 ± 0.060
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.7) 0.864 ± 0.125 0.895 ± 0.079 17.827 ± 2.377 19.032 ± 2.267 0.927 ± 0.086 0.932 ± 0.069
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 0.8) 0.845 ± 0.115 0.893 ± 0.076 17.577 ± 2.546 19.031 ± 2.755 0.902 ± 0.081 0.931 ± 0.063
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 1) 0.821 ± 0.147 0.890 ± 0.078 17.051 ± 2.306 18.841 ± 2.717 0.902 ± 0.092 0.931 ± 0.063
DNN-S output fˆ (q = 2) 0.819 ± 0.113 0.882 ± 0.078 16.822 ± 2.586 18.645 ± 2.860 0.889 ± 0.081 0.928 ± 0.059