Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):83–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.02.006

Table 1.

Itemwise Comparison of Quality of Life Scores as perceived by Parents.

SN Item Cases (n = 100)
Controls (n = 100)
Statistical significance
Mean SD Md Mean SD Md ‘z’ ‘p’
1. Difficulty in chewing 2.92 1.47 4 1.05 0.22 1 9.98 <0.001
2. Difficulty in biting 3.03 1.39 3 1.04 0.20 1 11.32 <0.001
3. Sensitivity to hot and cold 3.07 1.17 3 1.09 0.29 1 11.25 <0.001
4. Sensitivity to sweet food 2.67 1.17 2 1.07 0.26 1 10.81 <0.001
4. Toothache or pain now 3.50 1.27 4 1.04 0.20 1 11.64 <0.001
6. Toothache resulting into night awakening 2.98 1.46 2 1.17 0.38 1 9.90 <0.001
7. Happy with his/her teeth (reversed) 3.46 1.10 4 1.12 0.33 1 12.08 <0.001
8. Complains about teeth 3.44 1.22 4 1.05 0.22 1 11.91 <0.001
9. Barrier in playing 2.51 1.16 2 1.01 0.10 1 10.99 <0.001
10. Barrier in school learning 2.33 1.21 2 1.04 0.32 1 9.99 <0.001
11. Affects financially 2.89 1.46 3 1.03 0.17 1 10.08 <0.001
12. Affects family work 2.91 1.56 3 1.03 0.17 1 9.85 <0.001

Md = Median; Higher scores depict poorer quality of life.The responses were given on a 5-point rating scale ranging from 1=“disagree strongly” to 5=“agree strongly. ”The responses to the question “My child is happy with his/her teeth” were reversed to achieve unidirectional.