Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 9;10:4282. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60598-y

Table 4.

Comparison of EMD-6272 among leading backbone prediction methods.

Method % Cα in 3 Å RMSD (Å) FP%
Our method 99.0 0.85 0.0
Phenix 88.9 0.69 3.0
MAINMAST 89.7 1.55 0.3
Rosetta de-novo 64.0 0.84 1.9

Each method had specific strengths, however the our deep learning method produced the most complete structure as measured by the Cα matching percentage.