Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 26;2020:3265950. doi: 10.1155/2020/3265950

Table 5.

Comparison of length of stay (LOS) before and after CP implementation.

Before After p value
Total N = 100 N = 860
 Time from stroke onset to RT start 19.9 ± 20.0 5.5 ± 8.9 0.000∗∗∗
 Time from onset to RH transfer day 42.4 ± 36.0 22.3 ± 15.5 0.000∗∗∗
 RH LOS 64.5 ± 62.6 45.9 ± 32.9 0.004∗∗
 Total LOS 84.3 ± 58.6 68.2 ± 42.7 0.009∗∗
Infarction N = 48 N = 412
 Time from stroke onset to RT start 11.2 ± 12.1 1.5 ± 0.9 0.000∗∗∗
 Time from onset to RH transfer day 31.0 ± 22.7 15.7 ± 10.2 0.000∗∗∗
 RH LOS 57.2 ± 43.4 32.3 ± 25.4 0.000∗∗∗
 Total LOS 85.9 ± 54.8 47.9 ± 30.5 0.000∗∗∗
Hemorrhage N = 52 N = 448
 Time from stroke onset to RT start 27.8 ± 22.5 9.2 ± 11.2 0.000∗∗∗
 Time from onset to RH transfer day 53.0 ± 42.5 28.4 ± 17.0 0.000∗∗∗
 RH LOS 71.2 ± 76.0 58.5 ± 34.1 0.236
 Total LOS 82.8 ± 62.5 86.8 ± 43.9 0.652

Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (days). CP: critical pathway; RT: rehabilitation therapy; RH: rehabilitation; LOS: length of stay. p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001.