Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD001897. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001897.pub2

Soihet 1974.

Methods Randomised trial (method not stated) 
 Time of randomisation ‐ not stated 
 258 women analysed 
 No withdrawals after randomisation stated 
 Duration of follow up ‐ not stated
Participants Women with primary or secondary infertility with tubal immobility or occlusion. All women underwent tubal surgery involving cuff salpingostomy, tubal reanastomosis, tubal reimplantation, adhesiolysis or any combination of the above, in addition to ventrosuspension, by laparotomy. The procedure was covered by intraperitoneal instillation of chloramphenicol or penicillin and the same antibiotics systemically for 5 days. Mean age and mean duration of infertility not specified. Infertility work up not stated. No exclusion criteria prior to randomisation stated. The trial was carried out at San Marcos University, Lima, Peru. Timing and duration of trial not stated.
Interventions Early postoperative hydrotubation (solution not specified) twice weekly from day 5 to 6 weeks versus late postoperative hydrotubation twice weekly from weeks 6‐12 where the surgery had included Teflon stenting of the fallopian tubes (removed electively after 6 weeks) versus late postoperative hydrotubation twice weekly from week 6‐12 with a solution containing gentamicin where the surgery included tubal suspension in addition to Teflon tube stenting of the fallopian tubes (removed electively after 6 weeks)
Outcomes Outcomes of relevance to this review: 
 Pregnancy or live birth rate (per woman) 
 Ectopic pregnancy rate (per woman) 
 Method of diagnosis of pregnancy: term delivery 
 Tubal patency rate (of at least 1 fallopian tube, per woman) 
 Infective morbidity rate (per woman)
Other outcomes: 
 Bilateral tubal obstruction rate (per woman)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Study stated as randomised.
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Not stated within text.
Blinding? 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated within text.
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk  
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk Unequal numbers randomised into each group could represent deliberate unequal randomisation.
Free of other bias? Low risk