Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;2012(12):CD001894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub5

Balaban 2006.

Methods Randomisation by computer‐generated numbers
Participants 366 women from Turkey undergoing ICSI treatment only
Exclusion: women undergoing IVF
Interventions AH (laser thinning) n = 183
versus
No AH (laser thinning) n = 183
Unclear on how long before transfer, frozen‐thawed embryos only
Outcomes Primary: implantation rate,
Secondary: clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rate
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation by computer‐generated numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details in text
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No details on blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk There were no losses to follow up and all women were analysed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk The original protocol was not viewed but all outcomes listed in the methods section were reported. Live birth was not reported