Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;2012(12):CD001894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub5

Carter 2003.

Methods Single centre 
 Unclear if power calculation performed 
 Published as abstract and authors provided additional information
Participants 203 women from fertility clinic in US 
 Age < 40 years 
 FSH < 10, ovulatory menstrual cycles, day 3 ET with good embryo quality 
 Women with more than one failed IVF cycle were excluded
Interventions Laser hatching (n=121)
versus
No hatching (n=82)
Outcomes Clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate
Notes Additional information provided by authors 
 Drop‐outs were included for the denominator in this review
No. of embryos AH 2.2; Control 2.1
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomised, method by computer generation on day three
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear, no details provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Participants not blinded or unclear 
 Assessor not blinded or unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated but included drop‐outs
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk This was a conference abstract only and was not published as a full paper although the authors did provide some additional information. Live birth was not reported