Carter 2003.
Methods | Single centre Unclear if power calculation performed Published as abstract and authors provided additional information | |
Participants | 203 women from fertility clinic in US Age < 40 years FSH < 10, ovulatory menstrual cycles, day 3 ET with good embryo quality Women with more than one failed IVF cycle were excluded | |
Interventions | Laser hatching (n=121) versus No hatching (n=82) |
|
Outcomes | Clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate | |
Notes | Additional information provided by authors
Drop‐outs were included for the denominator in this review No. of embryos AH 2.2; Control 2.1 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomised, method by computer generation on day three |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear, no details provided |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Participants not blinded or unclear Assessor not blinded or unclear |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated but included drop‐outs |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | This was a conference abstract only and was not published as a full paper although the authors did provide some additional information. Live birth was not reported |