Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;2012(12):CD001894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub5

Petersen 2005.

Methods Randomised trial
Participants 150 Women from Brazil undergoing ART cycles 
 All participants had one failed treatment cycle 
 Mean age 34 years
Interventions ICSI cycles only 
 AH quarter‐laser thinning versus control
AH: 35 women with one previous implantation failure, 40 women with repeated implantation failures
Control: 35 women with one previous implantation failure, 40 women with repeated implantation failures
Outcomes Live birth, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy
Notes Author response
No. of ET: mean 2.7
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random number table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear ‐ a code ID to mask identity of the participant but not clear how or who generated this
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All women randomised appear to have been analysed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Original protocol not viewed but authors did report on live birth