Petersen 2005.
| Methods | Randomised trial | |
| Participants | 150 Women from Brazil undergoing ART cycles All participants had one failed treatment cycle Mean age 34 years | |
| Interventions | ICSI cycles only
AH quarter‐laser thinning versus control AH: 35 women with one previous implantation failure, 40 women with repeated implantation failures Control: 35 women with one previous implantation failure, 40 women with repeated implantation failures |
|
| Outcomes | Live birth, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy | |
| Notes | Author response No. of ET: mean 2.7 |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random number table |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear ‐ a code ID to mask identity of the participant but not clear how or who generated this |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All women randomised appear to have been analysed |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Original protocol not viewed but authors did report on live birth |