Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 9;174(5):e196306. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6306

Table 3. Model-Based Estimated Treatment Effects.

Outcome Change at 6 mo Persistence Between 6 and 9 mo
Treatment Effect, OR (95% CI) P Value Difference, OR (95% CI) P Value
Primary outcomes
Proportion of children screened appropriately for autism 1.29 (0.46 to 3.57) .63 0.72 (0.42 to 1.23) .23
Proportion of comorbid medical problems appropriately addressed in children with autism 0.80 (0.35 to 1.82) .59 1.40 (0.82 to 2.40) .22
Secondary outcomes
Proportion of children screened appropriately for general development 0.80 (0.13 to 5.04) .81 1.18 (0.44 to 3.16) .73
Proportion of comorbid medical conditions identified for each child with autisma 1.16 (0.69 to 1.94) .57 1.11 (0.82 to 1.50) .49
Knowledge Score, Δ (95% CI) 8.54 (4.09 to 12.98) <.001 0.62 (−2.24 to 3.48) .67
Self-efficacy Total Score, Δ (95% CI)b 29 (25 to 32) <.001 1 (−1 to 4) .29
Total perceived barriers to care (of 10 possible), Δ (95% CI) −2.20 (−2.74 to −1.67) <.001 0.02 (−0.37 to 0.41) .92

Abbreviation: OR, odds ratio.

a

Among 4 prespecified conditions (anxiety, behavioral problems, constipation, and sleep disorders).

b

Ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores meaning higher perceived self-efficacy.