Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar;24:100342. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100342

Table 1.

Health impact of vegetarian diets in comparison to omnivorous diets: summary of meta-analyses of cohort studies and randomised controlled trials.

Study Title Year Outcomes Studies N Effect (vegetarian vs omnivorous)a,b
Dinu et al. Vegetarian, vegan diets and multiple health outcomes: A systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies 2016 Multiple health outcomes n =10 cohort studies 72,298 IHD incidence and/or mortality: RR = 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68–0.82); Incidence total cancer: vegetarians RR = 0.92 (95% CI,0.87–0.98) vegans RR = 0.85 (95% CI, 0.75–0.95); All-cause mortality: vegetarians RR = 0.94ns (95% CI, 0.86–1.04) vegans RR = 0.88ns (95% CI, 0.75-1.02); Total cardiovascular disease incidence/mortality: RR = 0.93ns (95% CI, 0.86–1.00); Cerebrovascular disease incidence/mortality: RR = 0.93ns (95% CI, 0.78–1.10); Breast cancer incidence: RR 0.94ns (95% CI, 0.84–1.06); Colorectal mortality: RR = 0.90ns (95% CI, 0.76–1.05); Breast cancer mortality: RR = 0.94ns (95% CI, 0.56–1.58); Prostate cancer mortality: RR = 0.90ns (95% CI, 0.63–1.29); Lung cancer mortality: RR = 0.86ns (95% CI, 0.62–1.19)
Godos et al. Vegetarianism and breast, colorectal and prostate cancer risk: an overview and meta-analysis of cohort studies 2016 Prostate cancer, breast cancer, colo-rectal cancer n = 6 cohort studies 686,629 Breast cancer: RR = 0.96ns (95% CI, 0.88–1.05); Colorectal cancer: RR = 0.88ns (95% CI, 0.74–1.05); Prostate cancer: RR = 0.83ns (95% CI, 0.63–1.10)
Huang et al. Cardiovascular Disease Mortality and Cancer Incidence in Vegetarians:
A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
2012 Cardiovascular Disease Mortality and Cancer Incidence n = 7 cohort studies 124,706 IHD mortality: RR = 0.71; (95% CI, 0.56–0.87)
Cancer incidence: RR = 0.82; (95% CI, 0.67–0.97)
Iguacel et al. Veganism, vegetarianism, bone mineral density, and fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2019 Bone Health n = 19 cohort studies 37 134 Lumbar spine BMD MD: 0.032; (95% CI, - 0.048 to - 0.015); subgroup vegans MD, - 0.070; (95% CI, - 0.116 to - 0.025), vegetarians MD: 0.023; (95% CI, 0.035 to 0.010)
Femoral neck BMD MD: 0.037; (95% CI, - 0.054 to −0.020), subgroup: vegetarians MD: 0.025; (95% CI, - 0.038 to - 0.012), vegans MD, - 0.055; (95% CI, - 0.090 to - 0.021);
Whole body BMD MD: 0.048; (95% CI, - 0.080 to - 0.016); subgroup vegans MD: 0.059; (95% CI, 0.106 to 0.012): vegetarians MD: 0.035ns; (95% CI, 0.093 to 0.023);
Fracture risk RR: 1.316; (95% CI, 1.038–1.668); Subgroup vegans RR 1.439; (95% CI, 1.047–1.977); vegetarians RR: 1.254ns; (95% CI, 0.917–1.714)
Kwok et al. Vegetarian diet, Seventh Day Adventists and risk of cardiovascular mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis 2014 Risk cardiovascular mortality n = 8 cohort studies 183,321 Adventists vs non-Adventists
mortality risk: RR = 0.68 (95% CI, 0.45–1.02) vs RR = 1.04 ns (95% CI, 0.98–1.10)
IHD: RR = 0.60 (95% CI, 0.43–0.80) vs RR = 0.84 (95% CI, 0.74–0.96)
Cerebrovascular disease: RR = 0.71 (95% CI, 0.41–1.20) vs RR = 1.05 ns (95% CI, 0.89–1.24)
Lee et al. Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies 2017 Diabetes risk n = 14; 2 cohort 12 cross sectional not reported Cohorts: OR = 0.64 (95% CI, 0.57–0.74); Cohorts and Cross-Sectional: vegetarians OR = 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61–0.87); vegans OR = 0.59 (95% CI, 0.39–0.91)
Barnard et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ofChanges in Body Weight in Clinical Trials of Vegetarian Diets 2015 Weight reduction n = 4 RCTs 453 Intention-to-treat analysis MD: 3.4 kg (95% CI, -4.4 to -2.4)
Completer analysis MD: 4.6 kg (95% CI, -5.4 to -3.8)
Huang et al. Vegetarian Diets and Weight Reduction: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 2015 Weight reduction n = 12 RCTs 1151 MD: −2.02 kg (95% CI, -2.80 to -1.23)
Viguiliouk et al. Effect of vegetarian dietary patterns on cardiometabolic risk factors in diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 2018 Cardiometabolic risk factors in diabetes n = 9 RCTs 664 HbA1c (n = 8) MD: 0.29% (95% CI, -0.45 to -0.12)
Glucose MD (n = 6): -0.56 mmol/L (95% CI, -0.99 to −0.13)
LDL-C MD (n = 6): -0.12 mmol/L (95% CI, -0.20 to −0.04)
Non-HDL-C MD (n = 7): -0.13 mmol/L (95% CI,-0.26 to - 0.01)
HDL-C (n = 8): 0.03 mmol/L ns (95% CI, 0.08, 0.02)
Body weight MD (n = 6): 2.15 kg (95% CI, -2.95 to-1.34 kg)
Triglycerides MD (n = 7): 0.14 mmol/Lns (95% CI, -0.10 to 0.38)
SBP MD (n = 7): 0.10 mmHgns (95% CI, -2.33 to 2.52)
DBP MD (n = 7): 0.53 mmHgns (95% CI,-0.50 to 1.57)
Wang et al. Effects of Vegetarian Diets on Blood Lipids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 2015 Blood lipids n = 11 RCTs 832 Total cholesterol MD: -0.36 mmol/L (95% CI, -0.55 to - 0.17)
LDL-C MD: -0.34 mmol/L (95% CI, -0.57 to - 0.11)
HDL-C MD: -0.10 mmol/L (95% CI, -0.14 to -0.06)
Non–HDL-C MD: -0.30 mmol/L (95% CI, -0.50 to -0.10)
Triglycerides MD: 0.04 mmol/Lns (95% CI, -0.05 to 0.13)
Yokoyama et al. Association between plant-based diets and plasma lipids: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2017 Blood lipids n = 19 RCTs 1484 Total cholesterol MD: -12.5 mg/dL (95% CI, - 17,8 to −7,2)
LDL-C MD: -12.2 mg/dL (95% CI, -17,7 to -6,7)
HDL-C MD: -3.4 mg/dL (95% CI, -4,3 to -2,5)
Triglycerides MD: 5.8ns mg/dL (95% CI, -0.9 to 12,6)
Yokoyama et al. Vegetarian diets and glycaemic control in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2014 Glycaemic control in diabetes n = 6 RCTs 255 HbA1c MD: -0.3% (95% CI, --0.62 to -0.15)
Glucose MD: -0.36 mmol/L (95% CI, -1.04 to -0.32)
Yokoyama et al. Vegetarian Diets and Blood Pressure
A Meta-analysis
2014 Blood pressure n = 7 RCTs 311 SBP MD: -4.8 mm Hg (95% CI, -6.6 to -3.1)
DBP MD: -2.2 mm Hg (95% CI: -3.5 to -1.0)

N, number of pooled individuals; MD, mean difference; CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk; OR, odds ratio; IHD, ischemic heart disease; BMD, bone mineral density; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

a

All effect differences are between total vegetarian and omnivorous populations except when described.

b

All effects are significantly difference except when described; ns non-significant.