Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 10;15:99. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01616-7

Table 4.

Comparison of the local lumbar and lumbosacral deformity angle

Kyphosis angle(°) Angle correction Correction loss (°)
Group n
Pre Post FFU Post (°) Rate (%)
A1k 20 16.8 ± 8.5 3.8±1.5 5.1 ± 1.6 13.1 ± 7.6 74.9 ± 11.8 1.3 ± 0.6
B1k 16 17.5 ± 8.3 4.3±1.8 5.5 ± 1.8 13.2 ± 7.2 72.0 ± 11.9 1.2 ± 0.6
P value P = 0.806 P = 0.355 P = 0.460 P = 0.957 P = 0.469 P = 0.597
Lordotic angle (°)
Pre Post FFU
A1l 10 9.7 ± 8.8 16.9 ± 6.0 15.9 ± 6.0 7.1 ± 4.1 47.8 ± 27.2 0.9 ± 0.4
B1l 10 10.5 ± 7.6 18.1 ± 3.4 17.3 ± 3.7 7.6±5.1 46.4 ± 32.8 0.9 ± 0.3
P value P = 0.831 P = 0.565 P = 0.554 P = 0.818 P = 0.915 P = 0.847
Lumbosacral angle (°)
Pre Post FFU
A2 12 13.4 ± 6.8 19.4 ± 4.3 18.7 ± 4.4 6.0 ± 3.4 34.3 ± 21.5 0.7 ± 0.3
B2 14 13.7 ± 6.2 20.0 ± 3.4 19.3 ± 3.2 6.3 ± 3.2 34.1 ± 20.9 0.8 ± 0.3
P value P = 0.884 P= 0.676 P = 0.703 P = 0.832 P = 0.985 P = 0.611

Pre preoperative, post postoperative immediately, FFU final follow-up

A1k and B1k: the cases with a local lumbar kyphosis angle in lesions

A1l and B1l: the cases with a local lumbar lordotic angle in lesions