Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 19;2020:5132803. doi: 10.1155/2020/5132803

Table 15.

The mean and standard deviation of the IGD value of the four advanced many-objective evolutionary optimization algorithms on the UF1-9 test problems. The best value for each test case is highlighted with a bold background.

Problem M NSGAIII MOMBIII RPEA MyODEMR CMaPSO
UF1 2 1.3356e − 1 (2.19e − 2)= 9.4162e − 2 (1.62e − 2)+ 1.3086e − 1 (3.66e − 2)= 6.2656e − 2 (3.88e − 2)+ 1.3331e − 1 (3.73e − 2)
UF2 2 3.7800e − 2 (7.34e − 3)+ 4.7754e − 2 (1.52e − 2)+ 6.5567e − 2 (2.89e − 2)− 6.1227e − 2 (4.67e − 2)= 6.3018e − 2 (1.76e − 2)
UF3 2 2.1073e − 1 (4.71e − 2)+ 3.1511e − 1 (6.13e − 2)= 2.9777e − 1 (3.22e − 2)= 1.9565e − 1 (6.36e − 2)+ 3.1369e − 1 (2.23e − 2)
UF4 2 4.6032e − 2 (1.33e − 3)− 4.6501e − 2 (2.61e − 3)− 7.5297e − 2 (1.17e − 2)− 5.1650e − 2 (2.55e − 3)− 4.4248e − 2 (2.67e − 3)
UF5 2 2.7662e − 1 (7.32e − 2)+ 2.9237e − 1 (1.00e − 1)+ 3.2235e − 1 (1.15e − 1)+ 3.1381e − 1 (6.56e − 2)+ 1.1908e + 0 (2.65e − 1)
UF6 2 1.7038e − 1 (1.09e − 1)+ 1.7013e − 1 (9.07e − 2)+ 2.0888e − 1 (1.11e − 1)+ 2.4345e − 1 (1.21e − 1)− 2.2525e − 1 (1.68e − 1)
UF7 2 1.3985e − 1 (1.35e − 1)+ 2.2897e − 1 (1.76e − 1)= 2.4553e − 1 (1.39e − 1)− 5.2280e − 2 (6.40e − 2)+ 2.3489e − 1 (1.84e − 1)
UF8 3 4.9871e − 1 (1.03e − 1)− 4.3170e − 1 (1.26e − 1)− 5.2668e − 1 (4.79e − 2)− 2.9866e − 1 (4.61e − 2)− 2.2780e − 1 (5.92e − 3)
UF9 3 3.0157e − 1 (8.61e − 2)+ 3.6046e − 1 (1.10e − 1)+ 5.0350e − 1 (9.58e − 2)= 5.8142e − 1 (1.31e − 1)− 5.0482e − 1 (6.16e − 2)

+/−/= 6/2/1 5/2/2 2/4/3 4/4/1