Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan 7;246:112789. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112789

Table 2.

Among those in the bottom percentile of SES, percent of the period effect for drug misuse explaineda by mental health and pain measures, by age group and drug type

Age Group: Aged 20–49b
Aged 50–76
Drug Type: Any Drug Sedatives Any Drug Cannabis Prescription Painkillers Sedatives Other Drugs
Drug misuse
Among those in the bottom 1% of SES, percent of period effect explained by:
 Mental health measures (Model 2a) 25.0 21.9 13.2 7.2 18.7 20.9 18.9
  CIDI-SF major depression 2.8 1.6 2.4 2.0 4.3 2.7 3.0
  Negative affect 14.0 15.3 6.0 1.2 9.6 12.6 9.6
  Positive affect 6.1 5.4 3.0 1.7 4.7 5.2 −0.7
  Life satisfaction 4.6 2.1 2.7 3.2 1.6 2.3 7.3
  Psychological well-being −2.5 −2.4 −1.0 −1.4 5.8 −1.7 0.3
  Social well-being 3.9 −0.1 0.0 0.5 6.1 −0.2 −0.5
 Pain measures (Model 2b) 45.5 35.2 24.9 14.1 59.8 37.5 35.8
  Lower backache 22.2 13.5 11.8 8.6 26.5 13.8 10.4
  Joint aches/stiffness 23.3 21.7 13.2 5.5 33.3 23.7 25.4
 Both mental health and pain (Model 3) 50.7 38.8 26.8 15.6 62.5 37.9 40.4
  CIDI-SF major depression 2.5 1.4 3.9 1.8 3.4 2.4 2.5
  Negative affect 11.8 14.3 4.8 0.6 6.6 11.6 8.5
  Positive affect 5.1 4.9 3.0 1.3 3.0 4.6 −1.5
  Life satisfaction 4.6 2.1 1.5 3.1 −0.1 2.2 7.4
  Psychological well-being −2.5 −2.4 0.4 −1.4 0.1 −1.7 0.2
  Social well-being 0.0 −0.2 0.2 0.5 −0.1 −0.2 −0.5
  Lower backache 14.9 5.6 9.6 6.2 22.2 5.4 4.8
  Joint aches/stiffness 14.3 13.1 3.4 3.5 27.4 13.6 19.0
a

The percent explained by mental health and by pain measures is calculated using the Karlson-Holm-Breen (KHB) method (Karlson et al., 2012) with the Stata user-written program “khb” (Kohler et al., 2011).

b

We do not compute the percent explained in cases where the period effect was not significant (i.e., misuse of cannabis, prescription painkillers and other drugs among those aged 20–49).