Table 10. Logistic regression results.
| β | SE | eβ | 95% CI of eβ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | -1.10 | .11 | .38 | 0.21 | 0.68 |
| Role of Perpetrator | |||||
| Advisor/Mentor | -.04 | .17 | .97 | 0.68 | 1.37 |
| Chair/Head of Department | -.35 | .14 | .70 | 0.48 | 1.03 |
| Tenured | .06 | .13 | 1.06 | 0.83 | 1.35 |
| Dean | .08 | .57 | 1.09 | 0.39 | 3.03 |
| Principal Investigator | -.30 | .36 | .74 | 0.29 | 1.92 |
| Endowed/Named/Famous | -.11 | .22 | .89 | 0.56 | 1.43 |
| Other Supervisory Role | -.28 | .13 | .76 | 0.54 | 1.06 |
| Faculty† | .43** | .20 | 1.53** | 1.18 | 1.99 |
| Male | -.23 | .16 | .80 | 0.54 | 1.17 |
| Role of Respondent | |||||
| Student | .39*** | .18 | 1.47*** | 1.16 | 1.87 |
| Humanities | .02 | .22 | 1.02 | 0.67 | 1.54 |
| Social Science | -.02 | .22 | .98 | 0.63 | 1.52 |
| Physical Sciences | .54* | .40 | 1.72* | 1.09 | 2.72 |
| Engineering | .63 | .81 | 1.88 | 0.81 | 4.39 |
| Staff | -.39 | .41 | .67 | 0.21 | 2.19 |
| Institution Type‡ | |||||
| Other R1 | -.04 | .12 | .96 | 0.75 | 1.22 |
| Elite Institution/Ivy | .14 | .16 | 1.15 | 0.88 | 1.50 |
| N = 1,675 | |||||
Note
* p < .05
** p < .01
*** p < .001.
† = Any type of faculty; types coded as dichotomous.
‡ = Compared to reference group, consisting of an aggregate of: “Other Research Agency, Other Type of School, R2, Regional Teaching College, Small Liberal Arts College, [redacted], More than one institution”