Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 10;15(3):e0229983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229983

Table 3. Comparison of 3D ADC measurement for treatment response of osteosarcoma.

Parameters Poor responder Good responder P
n = 9 n = 2
Pretreatment 3D ADCmean 1472.7 [1128.1;1784.3] 1228.4 [943.2;1513.5] 0.480
Pretreatment 3D ADCskewness 0.3 [-0.5; 0.7] 0.4 [-0.7; 1.5] 0.814
Pretreatment 3D ADCkurtosis 4.7 [4.0; 5.8] 5.4 [4.0; 6.8] 0.637
n = 13 n = 4
Posttreatment 3D ADCmean 1574.3 [1309.6;1864.2] 2053.6 [1967.2;2224.6] 0.042*
Posttreatment 3D ADCskewness -0.0 [-0.4; 0.4] -0.9 [-1.2;-0.8] 0.017*
Posttreatment 3D ADCkurtosis 3.6 [3.0; 4.9] 5.1 [4.2; 5.5] 0.258
n = 9 n = 2
Percent change 3D ADCmean 10.6 [-2.4;20.4] 69.8 [28.1;111.5] 0.099
Percent change 3D ADCskewness -67.5 [-81.7;-21.3] -31.2 [-153.6;91.3] 1.000
Percent change 3D ADCkurtosis -21.9 [-42.6;23.4] -1.7 [-49.8;46.4] 0.637

3D ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from whole-tumor volume.

*indicates statistical significance.