Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Feb 3;47(3):173–179. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7002

TABLE 3.

Comparison of Multifidus and Erector Spinae Muscles Between Women and Men at Each Vertebral Level

Muscle/Measure/Spinal Level Women (n = 65)* Men (n = 37)* P Value Partial η2
Multifidus
 MFI
  L2 0.45 (0.44,0.47) 0.43 (0.40,0.45) .062 0.036
  L3 0.49 (0.47,0.51) 0.43 (0.41,0.61) <.001 0.139
  L4 0.58 (0.56,0.60) 0.51 (0.48,0.53) <.001 0.184
  L5 0.55 (0.53,0.57) 0.48 (0.45,0.51) <.001 0.128
 rmCSA, cm2
  L2 1.70 (1.54,1.86) 2.15 (1.93,2.37) .002 0.099
  L3 2.46 (2.29,2.63) 2.92 (2.68,3.16) .003 0.090
  L4 3.58 (3.32,3.85) 4.91 (4.55,5.28) <.001 0.257
  L5 4.30 (4.02,4.57) 5.30 (4.92,5.68) <.001 0.153
Erector spinae
 MFI
  L2 0.44 (0.43,0.46) 0.44 (0.42,0.46) .746 0.001
  L3 0.47 (0.46,0.49) 0.45 (0.42,0.47) .064 0.035
  L4 0.52 (0.50,0.54) 0.47 (0.44,0.49) .001 0.100
 rmCSA, cm2
  L2 8.89 (8.38,9.39) 12.27 (11.58,12.96) <.001 0.382
  L3 8.45 (7.97,8.93) 11.57 (10.92,12.23) <.001 0.370
  L4 6.36 (5.976.75) 8.44 (790,8.97) <.001 0.280

Abbreviations: MFI, muscle-to-fat index; rmCSA, relative muscle cross-sectional area.

*

Values are mean (95% confidence interval) after adjusting for age and body mass index.