Table 5.
Predicting the Count of Drinks | Predicting the Likelihood of Drinking | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | SE | RR | RR LCL | RR UCL | b | SE | OR | OR LCL | OR UCL | |
Intercept | −1.22 | 0.95 | 0.29 | 0.05 | 1.88 | −8.65 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
Person Level | ||||||||||
Sex | 0.32 | 0.12 | 1.37 | 1.09 | 1.73 | −0.37 | 0.30 | 0.69 | 0.39 | 1.23 |
Age | 0.01 | 0.03 | 1.01 | 0.95 | 1.07 | 0.35*** | 0.07 | 1.42 | 1.23 | 1.62 |
Access to Alcohol | 0.18 | 0.10 | 1.20 | 0.99 | 1.46 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 1.22 | 0.83 | 1.80 |
Norms | 0.42*** | 0.09 | 1.52 | 1.27 | 1.81 | 0.42* | 0.20 | 1.53 | 1.04 | 2.24 |
Perceived Vulnerability | 0.04 | 0.09 | 1.04 | 0.87 | 1.23 | −0.18 | 0.20 | 0.84 | 0.57 | 1.24 |
Prototype | 0.15 | 0.08 | 1.16 | 0.99 | 1.36 | 0.41* | 0.18 | 1.51 | 1.05 | 2.16 |
Willingness | 0.20* | 0.08 | 1.23 | 1.04 | 1.44 | 0.72*** | 0.18 | 2.06 | 1.45 | 2.92 |
Daily Level | ||||||||||
Weekend vs Weekday | 0.18 | 0.16 | 1.20 | 0.87 | 1.64 | 0.06 | 0.37 | 1.07 | 0.52 | 2.21 |
Month of Year | 0.08 | 0.09 | 1.08 | 0.90 | 1.29 | −0.15 | 0.19 | 0.86 | 0.59 | 1.26 |
Day of Survey | 0.03* | 0.01 | 1.03 | 1.01 | 1.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 1.03 | 0.97 | 1.10 |
Negative Affect | 0.11 | 0.12 | 1.12 | 0.88 | 1.42 | 0.13 | 0.36 | 1.13 | 0.56 | 2.31 |
Positive Affect | 0.36*** | 0.09 | 1.43 | 1.21 | 1.69 | 0.84** | 0.26 | 2.30 | 1.38 | 3.84 |
Norms | 0.36*** | 0.09 | 1.44 | 1.21 | 1.71 | 0.69** | 0.22 | 2.00 | 1.30 | 3.08 |
Perceived Vulnerability | −0.05 | 0.11 | 0.96 | 0.78 | 1.18 | −0.18 | 0.28 | 0.83 | 0.48 | 1.44 |
Prototype | −0.26 | 0.16 | 0.77 | 0.57 | 1.06 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 1.59 | 0.69 | 3.69 |
Willingness | 0.21*** | 0.06 | 1.24 | 1.11 | 1.38 | 0.90*** | 0.15 | 2.47 | 1.85 | 3.29 |
Note. * p < .05. *** p < .001; PV=Perceived Vulnerability. OR = odds ratio; RR = risk ratio; LCL = 95% lower confidence limit; UCL = 95% upper confidence limit. We controlled for negative and positive affect (within-person), age, sex, access to alcohol, weekend/weekday, day of the survey, and month as covariates.