Table 1 – Aβ(−) trained brain ages show significant differences between AD diagnostic groups and amyloid status in CN participants:
Results of the multivariable linear regression analysis of the Aβ(−) trained model are shown for cognitive diagnostic groups and amyloid status as a sub-analysis of the CN group. The reference test group was CN for comparison between diagnostic groups and CN-Aβ(−) PITT for CN subgroups. (CA = chronological age)
| Term | Estimate | Std Error | t Ratio | p-value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive diagnostic groups (CN as reference) | ||||||
| Intercept | 35.291579 | 2.243782 | 15.73 | <.0001 | 30.882867 | 39.70029 |
| CA | 0.5093958 | 0.029011 | 17.56 | <.0001 | 0.4523937 | 0.5663979 |
| EMCI | 1.020452 | 0.467582 | 2.18 | 0.0296 | 0.1017208 | 1.9391832 |
| LMCI | 4.2385508 | 0.551762 | 7.68 | <.0001 | 3.1544176 | 5.322684 |
| AD | 6.7979684 | 0.572472 | 11.87 | <.0001 | 5.6731422 | 7.9227945 |
| Amyloid status in CN group (CN-Aβ(−) PITT as reference) | ||||||
| Intercept | 34.463869 | 4.644971 | 7.42 | <.0001 | 25.274351 | 43.653388 |
| CA | 0.5050906 | 0.060237 | 8.39 | <.0001 | 0.3859185 | 0.6242627 |
| CN-Aβ(−) | 1.0575062 | 0.781668 | 1.35 | 0.1784 | −0.48893 | 2.6039429 |
| CN-Aβ(+) | 1.9821045 | 0.781679 | 2.54 | 0.0124 | 0.4356468 | 3.5285621 |