Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Nov 14;87:44–48. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.11.005

Table 1 – Aβ(−) trained brain ages show significant differences between AD diagnostic groups and amyloid status in CN participants:

Results of the multivariable linear regression analysis of the Aβ(−) trained model are shown for cognitive diagnostic groups and amyloid status as a sub-analysis of the CN group. The reference test group was CN for comparison between diagnostic groups and CN-Aβ(−) PITT for CN subgroups. (CA = chronological age)

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio p-value Lower 95% Upper 95%
Cognitive diagnostic groups (CN as reference)
Intercept 35.291579 2.243782 15.73 <.0001 30.882867 39.70029
CA 0.5093958 0.029011 17.56 <.0001 0.4523937 0.5663979
EMCI 1.020452 0.467582 2.18 0.0296 0.1017208 1.9391832
LMCI 4.2385508 0.551762 7.68 <.0001 3.1544176 5.322684
AD 6.7979684 0.572472 11.87 <.0001 5.6731422 7.9227945
Amyloid status in CN group (CN-Aβ(−) PITT as reference)
Intercept 34.463869 4.644971 7.42 <.0001 25.274351 43.653388
CA 0.5050906 0.060237 8.39 <.0001 0.3859185 0.6242627
CN-Aβ(−) 1.0575062 0.781668 1.35 0.1784 −0.48893 2.6039429
CN-Aβ(+) 1.9821045 0.781679 2.54 0.0124 0.4356468 3.5285621