Table 3.
Comparison of photocatalytic aniline degradation results of this study and open literatures.
| Catalyst | Aniline concentration (mg.L−1) | Catalyst amount (g.L−1) | Degradation | Illumination time (min) | Light source | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cr-ZnO | 150 | — | 93% | 360 | Solar light | 70 |
| ZnO/ H3PMo12O40 | 50 | 0.5 | 43.8% | 180 | UV | 76 |
| TiO2 | 50 | 0.06 | 62% | 120 | UV | 77 |
| CuO | 50 | 0.05 | 78% | 60 | UV | 78 |
| WO3/Cu (II) | 150 | — | 85.44% | 180 | Visible light | 79 |
| BiO1.1Br0.8 | 50 | 1 | 90% | 240 | Visible light | 80 |
| Barbituric acid doped carbon nitride (CN-BA) | 16 | 0.66 | 91.53% | 120 | Sunlight | 74 |
| RGO/ZnO/MoS2 | 80 | 0.7 | 100% | 120 | Visible light | This study |