Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 10;10:4443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61333-3

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Study design. Three images of each participant were taken with the 3dMDface (left) and the Vectra H1 (right), for a total of 6 image replicates per participant. Each image was then registered three times with MeshMonk, resulting in a total of 18 quasi-landmark configurations per individual. Comparisons of each set of registrations to the average of all three registration iterations (column-wise) led to estimates of MeshMonk precision. Within-camera comparisons of the three average registrations to the overall average for that camera gave estimates of participant error per camera as well as technical error per camera, when analyzing the mannequin images. Lastly, the average quasi-landmark configuration from each camera was compared to create estimates of error due to imaging system. Individual imaged is one of the authors.