Table 2.
ANOVA on 19 traditional landmarks.
| Covariate | Df | SS | MS | Rsq | F | Pr (>F)100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camera | 1 | 10 | 9.68 | 0.00024 | 0.5959 | 0.37 |
| Individual | 34 | 19657 | 578.16 | 0.47947 | 35.4204 | 0.01 |
| Camera:Individual | 34 | 555 | 16.32 | 0.01354 | 2.9581 | 0.01 |
| Residuals | 140 | 773 | 5.52 | 0.01884 | ||
| Total | 209 | 40998 |
After non-scaled, non-reflected GPA alignment, an ANOVA was used to assess the relative contribution to form variation in the 19 traditional landmarks automatically indicated on the participants. Type III sums of squares was used, with the 100 iterations and formula of y ~ Camera:Individual. Camera was treated as a fixed effect and individual as a random effect.