Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 24;33(1):168–180. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00250-y

Table 4.

Performance comparison with existing methodologies

Publication year Method Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity
2004 Niemeijer [18] 0.9417 0.6898 0.9696
2006 Soares [28] 0.9446 0.7230 0.9762
2012 Fraz [29] 0.948 0.7406 0.9807
2014 Cheng [30] 0.9474 0.7252 0.9798
2016 Aslani [31] 0.9513 0.7545 0.9801
2018 Shahid [32] 0.958 0.730 0.9793
2018 Soomro [33] 0.953 0.752 0.976
2018 Biswal [34] 0.9541 0.71 0.97
2018 Wang [35] 0.9541 0.7648 0.9817
DNN-based methods
2016 Li [36] 0.9527 0.7569 0.9816
2016 Liskowski [37] 0.9515 0.752 0.9806
2018 Oliveira [38] 0.9576 0.8039 0.9804
2018 Jiang [39] 0.9624 0.754 0.9825
2018 Yan [40] 0.9542 0.7653 0.9818
2018 Hu [41] 0.9533 0.7772 0.9793
2019 Proposed method (RGB) 0.954 0.8188 0.964
  Proposed method (enhanced green channel) 0.9594 0.7287 0.9818
  Proposed method (morphological operation) 0.9637 0.8653 0.9725
  Proposed method (local normalization) 0.9531 0.8172 0.9624

Values in italics specify the maximum values