Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 2;75(3):374–385. doi: 10.1111/anae.14892

Table 1.

Literature estimates of aspiration risk during procedural sedationa

Study Population Principal Agent Endoscopy? Total Subjects Aspiration overall Aspiration during non‐fasted procedures Aspiration mortality
Bhatt 39 Children Ketamine No 6295 None None None
Beach 19 Children Propofol Some 139,142 1:13,914 1:12,701 None
Chiaretti 40 Children Propofol Some 36,516 None None None
Friedrich 41 Adults Propofol All 15,690 1:541 Not stated None
Rajasekaran 42 Children Propofol All 12,447 None None None
Agostoni 43 Mixed Propofol All 17,999 1:1,000 Not stated None
Dean 44 Mostly adults Propofol None 62,125 None Not stated None
Green 45 Children Ketamine None 8282 None None None
Rex 46 Adults Propofol All 646,080 Not stated Not stated None
Horiuchi 47 Adults Propofol All 10,662 None None None
Vespasiano 48 Children Propofol None 7304 1:7,304 Not stated None
Onody 49 Mostly Children Nitrous oxide Some 35,828 None None None
Tohda 50 Adults Propofol All 27,500 1:6,875 Not stated None
Sanborn 51 Children Pentobarbital None 16,467 1:8,234 None stated None
Walker 52 Adults Propofol All 9152 1:9,152 Not stated None
Gall 53 Children Nitrous oxide Some 7511 None None None
a

To include just the largest studies, we display those with 5000 or more patients. We also exclude studies which report duplicate subsets of patients.